Loading...
Loading...
On-Air Promo Creative 115x175
|| Election 2008 ||
Page 1 of 1

Biden, Palin Debate Same-Sex Marriage

As Alaska governor Sarah Palin and Delaware senator Joe Biden sparred over same-sex unions in their first and only debate Thursday night, one thing was clear: They both oppose gay marriage. But when Biden delved deeper into equal rights and protections for gay couples, Palin didn't take the bait.



Do Sen. Joe Biden and Gov. Sarah Palin agree on the rights of same-sex couples? That may have been the impression of some viewers based on the exchange they had during the first and only vice-presidential debate Thursday night.

It started when moderator Gwen Ifill asked Senator Biden if he supported providing benefits for same-sex couples, as they currently do for partners of state employees in Alaska.

“Absolutely,” Biden said. “Do I support granting same-sex benefits? Absolutely, positively. Look, in an Obama-Biden administration, there will be absolutely no distinction from a constitutional standpoint or a legal standpoint between a same-sex and a heterosexual couple.

Biden then moved beyond benefits to detail the rights he and Sen. Barack Obama believe gay couples should have. “The fact of the matter is that under the Constitution we should be granted -- same-sex couples should be able to have visitation rights in hospitals, joint ownership of property, life insurance policies, etc. That's only fair,” he said. “It's what the Constitution calls for. And so we do support it. We do support making sure that committed couples in a same-sex marriage are guaranteed the same constitutional benefits as it relates to their property rights, their rights of visitation, their rights to insurance, their rights of ownership as heterosexual couples do.”

At that point, Ifill turned to Governor Palin and asked if she supported extending Alaska’s policy of providing same-sex partner benefits to the rest of the country.

“Well, not if it goes closer and closer towards redefining the traditional definition of marriage between one man and one woman. And unfortunately, that's sometimes where those steps lead,” Palin responded, adding that her answer shouldn’t be taken to mean that she would “be anything but tolerant of adults in America choosing their partners, choosing relationships that they deem best for themselves.”

But in contrast to Biden, rather than affirming that same-sex couples need certain protections in order to ensure that they are afforded similar rights to straight couples, Palin simply asserted that she and John McCain would never purposely deprive gay couples of those rights.

“No one would ever propose, not in a McCain-Palin administration, to do anything to prohibit, say, visitations in a hospital or contracts being signed, negotiated between parties,” Palin said, adding, “But I will tell Americans straight up that I don't support defining marriage as anything but between one man and one woman.”?

Ifill redirected to Biden: “Senator, do you support gay marriage?”

“No. [Neither] Barack Obama nor I support redefining from a civil side what constitutes marriage. We do not support that,” Biden said.

Biden then circled back to the concept of equal rights, trying to pin Palin down on whether she believed gay couples should have the same constitutional rights -- presumably via civil unions or domestic partnerships -- as heterosexual couples.

“The bottom line though is, and I'm glad to hear the governor, I take her at her word, obviously, that she thinks there should be no civil rights distinction, none whatsoever, between a committed gay couple and a committed heterosexual couple,” Biden said. “If that's the case, we really don't have a difference.”

“Is that what you said?” asked Ifill.

But Palin stuck to the definition of marriage rather than engaging the topic of constitutional rights. “Your question to him was whether he supported gay marriage and my answer is the same as his and it is that I do not,” she said.

Ifill concluded, “Wonderful. You agree. On that note, let's move to foreign policy.”

The nuanced discussion may well have been lost on average viewers, who easily could have walked away thinking that the two candidates hold essentially the same view: They do not support gay marriage. But Senator Biden argued that same-sex couples should be treated equally under the law and afforded all the same rights and responsibilities as straight married couples.

Governor Palin did not clarify whether she agreed with Biden on that point. Based on past statements, one might reasonably deduce that she does not. Although she did veto a bill in Alaska that would have denied health benefits to partners of state employees, she did so at the urging of her attorney general, who argued that signing the bill would have been a violation of the state constitution as interpreted by Alaska’s highest court. At the time, Palin said she personally disagreed with providing same-sex partner benefits but was legally compelled as governor to kill the bill.

Senator Obama supports civil unions that provide equal rights and responsibilities to gay couples. Senator McCain has indicated that he is opposed to civil unions -- or any agreement -- that nears the legal equivalent of marriage.

Overall, the discourse around gay marriage was reminiscent of other portions of the debate: Joe Biden generally went into greater depth on the issues and Sarah Palin usually stuck to a certain set of talking points.

Most pundits agreed that while Governor Palin exceeded expectations, Senator Biden demonstrated greater fluency with the subject matter.

Early polls suggested that viewers agreed: CNN found debate watchers thought Biden won the night by a margin of 51% to 36%; CBS surveyed uncommitted voters, who favored Biden over Palin 46% to 21%, with 33% of them calling it a draw.

Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Twitter. Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Facebook. Page 1 of 1
Reader Comments
  • Name: Dennis
    Date posted: 10/21/2008 4:23:00 PM
    Hometown: Phoenix

    Comment:

    Fucking bitches all politicians need to butt out or our business, man woman man man, marriage- Marriage has always been something in churches and whatnot, they should absolve all legal "marriage" and only make civil unions, keep marriage sacred by keeping it in the church or the dojo or the park, marriage nowadays is such a gray area anyways, many people are finding out that in today's world, using such a traditional system doesn't work.. So anyways, make it all completely legal and right by tailoring it to each couple and each family, one family gets the funds for whatever and legal rights and tax refunds.. A couple gets their own rights to build their own lives on....

  • Name: Rob
    Date posted: 10/7/2008 12:06:00 AM
    Hometown: Indianapolis

    Comment:

    This story justifies the opposition of Obama and Biden of gay marriage, and at same time reasons that Palin's opposition of gay marriage is somehow worse. They're all against gay marriage. This article is all political. It makes Obama and Biden's opposition OK because they're Democrats and makes Palin's opposition wrong because she's a Republican... So we don't want people to discriminate against us, but it's OK to do that against Palin because of her political affiliation? Really, Advocate, stop judging by political affiliation and just be honest. They're all wrong!

  • Name: Dwayne F Matthews
    Date posted: 10/6/2008 12:51:00 PM
    Hometown: Chicago

    Comment:

    As a gay minority, I took offense to Gov Palin's comment about being "TOLERANT"... very saddening, but a clear indicator of what her views are. Sen Biden missed an opportunity to point that out as well... unless of course he is also "TOLERANT"

  • Name: Chris
    Date posted: 10/5/2008 2:03:00 PM
    Hometown: California

    Comment:

    Thanks Ronald, I will be joining. I have had it with the Democratic Party!

  • Name: Ronald
    Date posted: 10/5/2008 3:34:00 AM
    Hometown: Honolulu

    Comment:

    Chris, we have a party and its called the Green Party gp dot org. They support full marriage rights for LGBT citizens and its even noted in their platform.

  • Name: Mark
    Date posted: 10/4/2008 8:29:00 PM
    Hometown: Portland

    Comment:

    Some Please explain to me how same-sex marriage is baned by the constitution currently? As i read it the law has no part in how a religion chooses follow their sacraments; Isn't there a part of The United States Constitution that says that the government isn't allowed to create or establish a religion which it follows (a ban on theocracy) while allowing religious freedom? This means a particular religion doesn't have to provide for same-sex marriages but shouldn't be allowed to dictate that to others either (don't like it join some other church). To that end isn't just like laws the prevented interracial marriages not so long ago? Also to that end ... How can Polygamy actually be baned and be Constitutional ?

  • Name: Chris
    Date posted: 10/4/2008 1:26:00 AM
    Hometown: California

    Comment:

    Wake up LGBT community! Biden said neither he nor Obama supports gay marriage. There is no gray area in that statement. Who cares if Obama/Biden claim to be more tolerant of gay rights than Republicans? Are we supposed to be like, "Oh well that's good enough for now. At least we're making progress. We need to take baby steps." I am so sick of Democrats who show up to LGBT events saying they are 100% in favor of equal rights for LGBT. They take our money and our votes and later betray us by saying, "We don't need gay marriage because the constitution already protects gay rights." I'm sick of LGBT leaders justifying that betrayal by saying, "Oh well you know they're a lot better than the alternative." What a bunch of crap! The LGBT community needs to “grow a set” and show zero tolerance for any candidate who doesn't fully support gay marriage. If that means going against the Dems then so be it. Obama/Biden lost my vote last night. Maybe we need to form our own party.

  • Name: AMERICA
    Date posted: 10/4/2008 12:31:00 AM
    Hometown: AMERICA

    Comment:

    Joe Biden gets it! He may not support full marriage equality yet, but AN OBAMA & BIDEN ADMINISTRATION WILL BE MORE SUPPORTIVE OF RIGHTS THAN even Clinton was. GO BIDEN & OBAMA! EQUAL RIGHTS FOR ALL!

  • Name: Sharon
    Date posted: 10/3/2008 7:46:00 PM
    Hometown: New York

    Comment:

    Our founding fathers knew what the word tolerant meant. Below a quote from Revolutionary Spirits by Gary Kowalski, pg. 82: On religious freedom, George Washington said: "To the Jewish congregation of Newport, Rhode Island, he offered assurances that the government of the United States 'gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance,' ... Significantly, Washington added, that 'it is now no more that toleration is spoken of,' as if religious minorities were merely vexations to be endured by members of a more predominant faith...." I'm sure there are other groups that Palin tolerates as vexations to be endured.

  • Name: John Thompson
    Date posted: 10/3/2008 6:47:00 PM
    Hometown: Charlotte, NC

    Comment:

    I am so weary of hearing "one man, one woman". Let's put some teeth and responsibility into the privilege of marriage with its attendant benefits. How about "one man, one woman, one time". See how they like that.

 PREVIOUS 1 2 3 NEXT  


More Online Only
  • Art Slideshow Flag Artist Spotlight: Que Duong

    A fortune-teller told Que Duong's mother he would amount to nothing — which is why he gives everything he has to each photo he takes.

  • Music Thicke and Juicy

    Sexy soul singer Robin Thicke opens up about his Precious wife, homophobia in the music industry, and the gay men who’ve shaped his life and love since childhood. 

  • Internet Herman on Why He Wants to Stop H8

    Fitness trainer, Real World alum, and marriage equality advocate Scott Herman took some time between crunches to tell The Advocate that his concern for gay rights isn't manufactured, and he doesn't mind men checking him out.

  • News Celebration of Courage Not So Courageous

    Advocate contributor Michael Lucas says the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission needs to be doing more to stop violence against gays and lesbians in countries "oppressed by Islam."

  • Commentary The Truth Behind Her Name Was Steven

    Advocate contributor Eden Lane says CNN's Her Name Was Steven will help raise the visibility of trans people on TV, but the most compelling part of Susan Stanton's journey was left to a title card at the end of the film.

  • Television Laverne, Surely

    I Want to Work for Diddy alum Laverne Cox leads a trio of transgender ladies in VH1’s Transform Me, a new makeover show that flatters her hooker-heavy résumé.

  • Music Cherie’s Jubilee

    With The Runaways, the new film about her life with Joan Jett, pioneering rock star Cherie Currie is enjoying a renaissance ... with a little help from Dakota Fanning.

  • Activism Sex-Ed Student Turns Teen Activist

    When sex education classes at Danny Sparks's high school failed to address the issues important to him, he took matters into his own hands ... and became an activist in the process.

  • Photography Slideshow Flag Artist Spotlight: Ryan Colford

    From his "candy shoppe" line — sweet treats made oh-so sexy — to his black and white studies of the male form, photographer Ryan Colford exposes the beauty of the male body.

  • Commentary What Massa Could Learn From Ashburn

    COMMENTARY: Matthew S. Bajko says Republican California state senator Roy Ashburn deserves praise for coming out of the closet despite his antigay voting record. Now, if only former congressman Eric Massa would follow his lead.

  • Music The Truth About Tracy and Kim

    Don’t be tardy for this party! DJ Tracy Young comes clean — mostly — about her rumored lesbian relationship with Real Housewives of Atlanta star Kim Zolciak.

  • News Video Content Flag Kids Say the Darndest Things

    Micah Schraft and his boyfriend, John, were filming Micah's family at Thanksgiving when the 5-year-old son of a family friend wanted to know if the two were husbands. The result is a video you have to see. 

  • Commentary The Importance of Being Counted

    With benefits from boosting hate-crimes and marriage equality laws to simply letting legislators know gay Americans indeed exist, the 2010 Census is a chance to stand up and be counted.

1037 COVER X135 | ADVOCATE.COM