Loading...
Loading...
On-Air Promo Creative 115x175
|| News ||

POST COMMENT(57)   Bookmark and Share EMAIL  PRINT  RECOMMEND

2 readers have recommended this story.

Page 1 of 1

Scalia on Sodomy and the Constitution


Antonin Scalia x390 (GETTY) | ADVOCATE.COM

Back when the Constitution was being drafted, there was no way to account for modern issues like abortion or sodomy, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said on Tuesday.

On the concept of interpreting the Constitution, Scalia said he embraces the school of thought that the document should be interpreted as its authors intended.

"My burden is not to show that originalism is perfect but to show that it beats the other available alternatives," Scalia said according to the Associated Press. "Did any provision of the Constitution guarantee a right to abortion? No one thought so for almost two centuries after the founding. Did any provision in the Constitution guarantee a right to homosexual sodomy? Same answer."

Scalia was delivering a keynote address at the Ohio State University School of Law.

Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Twitter. Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Facebook. Page 1 of 1

POST COMMENT(57)   Bookmark and Share EMAIL  PRINT  RECOMMEND

2 readers have recommended this story.

Reader Comments
  • Name: Bryan
    Date posted: 11/23/2009 2:38:10 PM
    Hometown: San Francisco

    Comment:

    How the hell does a man who seems to believe that sodomy is some kind of new sexual behavior become a justice of the Supreme Court? God I hope this dipshit dies during a liberal presidential administration.

  • Name: Ryan
    Date posted: 11/21/2009 10:39:35 PM
    Hometown: Boston

    Comment:

    @Theo, Justice Scalia would tell you that the fact that the founding fathers' ownership of slaves is constitutionally irrelevant, because the Thirteenth Amendment bans slavery and the Fourteenth guarantees equal protection of the laws. I disagree with him on almost everything, but I recognize that he's a smart man and therefore don't make dumb ass, specious arguments about why he's wrong.

  • Name: Ernest
    Date posted: 11/21/2009 8:52:49 AM
    Hometown: Houston

    Comment:

    This pig will never be a "justice". He has earned total contempt of court.

  • Name: Theo
    Date posted: 11/20/2009 7:55:56 PM
    Hometown: Atlanta

    Comment:

    How many of the founding fathers owned slaves? With Scalia's rationality I assume he would also find slavery constitutional today.

  • Name: Daniel S
    Date posted: 11/20/2009 3:23:23 PM
    Hometown: New Hope, PA

    Comment:

    So, essentially Scalia's argument is that because the Founding Fathers didn't see fit to explicitly reference sexuality back in the late 18th Century that therefore it should not be a subject of merit. He's a hypocrite. A solid majority of the Founding Fathers were vehemently anti-Catholic and would be furious if they knew how much money the modern U.S. government gives to the Roman Catholic Church to support "charitable" activities. They would have almost certainly seen that as unconstitutional back in their day, yet Scalia tends to rule that such things do not violate the Constitution. The notion of "Founder Intent" is inherently flawed since it presumes that we should base people's rights on the hypothetical thoughts of people more than two centuries ago. Scalia frequently slants his rulings to favor his preferred groups while opposing those he dislikes.

  • Name: John Davis
    Date posted: 11/20/2009 1:47:05 PM
    Hometown: Davison, MI

    Comment:

    Scalia said there was no way to account for Sodomy when the constitution was written. Sodomy is mentioned in the Bible.. (Read the story of Sodom and Gamorra) In the old Testament no less. So, that statement clearly is not accurate.. Sodomy was indeed known thousands of years before the Constitution was drafted. Now... This post is only an observation.. It is NOT an opinion nor should it be taken as an endorsement of anything at all (Save the Bible, and I might add. NOT even that if said Bible is KJV)

  • Name: Tom
    Date posted: 11/20/2009 1:03:41 PM
    Hometown: South Jersey

    Comment:

    Ah, but what about heterosexual sodomy? Surely the founding fathers wanted to keep that option opened.

  • Name: Roger Burr
    Date posted: 11/20/2009 12:37:42 PM
    Hometown: Marble Hill, MO

    Comment:

    So much for judicial objectivity! Scalia has shown his disposition of this matter, long before a suit ever even gets to the SCOTUS. As a Catholic; his is parroting the hatred spewed by his church and has always been on the right-wing of the court. Very often we look for electoral victories to further our cause. But Mayors, Governors, Congressman, Senators and even Presidents; come and go. The people who hold the REAL power in this country; who REALLY RULE, are the nine people who sit on the Supreme Court. THAT is where the conservatives have their eyes set. Supreme Court decisions will rule, long after Obama and everone else presently in government, has left the stage.

  • Name: Val
    Date posted: 11/20/2009 11:53:46 AM
    Hometown: London, UK

    Comment:

    Did he really use the word "sodomy"?? I like that he talks about whether the Constitution guarantees a right to "homosexual sodomy" as if "heterosexual sodomy", on the other hand, had a specific amendment about it.

  • Name: Mark
    Date posted: 11/20/2009 10:38:32 AM
    Hometown: Wappingers Falls

    Comment:

    I pray that Scalia and the other four radical right wing activist Republican judges on the lifetime Supreme Court retire soon and Obama replaces them with fair-minded, competent judges who understand the US Constitution calls for government not to infringe on our lives as citizens, and demands liberty and justice for ALL. So laws like DOMA and DADT (and the old sodomy law) as well as the concept of the majority voting on the rights of the minority via ballot initiatives are clearly unconstitutional. Only a judge like Scalia with a personal/hateful anti-gay agenda could vote otherwise.

 PREVIOUS 1 2 3 4 5  ... NEXT  


More Online Only
  • News Celebration of Courage Not So Courageous

    Advocate contributor Michael Lucas says the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission needs to be doing more to stop violence against gays and lesbians in countries "oppressed by Islam."

  • Commentary The Truth Behind Her Name Was Steven

    Advocate contributor Eden Lane says CNN's Her Name Was Steven will help raise the visibility of trans people on TV, but the most compelling part of Susan Stanton's journey was left to a title card at the end of the film.

  • Television Laverne, Surely

    I Want to Work for Diddy alum Laverne Cox leads a trio of transgender ladies in VH1’s Transform Me, a new makeover show that flatters her hooker-heavy résumé.

  • Music Cherie’s Jubilee

    With The Runaways, the new film about her life with Joan Jett, pioneering rock star Cherie Currie is enjoying a renaissance ... with a little help from Dakota Fanning.

  • Activism Sex-Ed Student Turns Teen Activist

    When sex education classes at Danny Sparks's high school failed to address the issues important to him, he took matters into his own hands ... and became an activist in the process.

  • Photography Slideshow Flag Artist Spotlight: Ryan Colford

    From his "candy shoppe" line — sweet treats made oh-so sexy — to his black and white studies of the male form, photographer Ryan Colford exposes the beauty of the male body.

  • Commentary What Massa Could Learn From Ashburn

    COMMENTARY: Matthew S. Bajko says Republican California state senator Roy Ashburn deserves praise for coming out of the closet despite his antigay voting record. Now, if only former congressman Eric Massa would follow his lead.

  • Music The Truth About Tracy and Kim

    Don’t be tardy for this party! DJ Tracy Young comes clean — mostly — about her rumored lesbian relationship with Real Housewives of Atlanta star Kim Zolciak.

  • News Video Content Flag Kids Say the Darndest Things

    Micah Schraft and his boyfriend, John, were filming Micah's family at Thanksgiving when the 5-year-old son of a family friend wanted to know if the two were husbands. The result is a video you have to see. 

  • Commentary The Importance of Being Counted

    With benefits from boosting hate-crimes and marriage equality laws to simply letting legislators know gay Americans indeed exist, the 2010 Census is a chance to stand up and be counted.

  • Marriage Equality We Now Pronounce You ...

    When Jonathan Howard and Gregory Jones found out Crate & Barrel's Ultimate Wedding Contest was open to couples holding commitment ceremonies, they entered. Now, they have a good shot at winning.

  • Music Matt Morris: An Ideal Husband

    Singer-songwriter and Out 100 honoree Matt Morris talks RuPaul’s Drag Race, coming out to pal Justin Timberlake, and the big secret to being a successful gay artist.

  • News View From Washington: Showdown

    The effort to end "don't ask, don't tell" heated up this week with the introduction of Senate legislation. But lawmakers are now facing off with the military over when to pass repeal.

  • DVDs Hot Sheet: Greek, Groove, and Alice

    This week Greek wants you to think back to your frat days, Johnny Depp is looking to explore the Mad Hatter's Gay Days, and Little Boots goes after Gaga's gays.

  • Politics Perez Talks Prop. 8, HIV, and the Economy

    John Pérez (left) became California's first openly gay assembly speaker on Monday. By Tuesday he was laying out his agenda for issues including HIV funding, jobs, and reinstating marriage equality in the Golden State.

  • Music Keeping Up With Ke$ha

    The hard-partying “Tik Tok” singer lives up to her wild reputation with stories of a fantasy all-girl sleepover with Shakira and Sarah Palin, bashing critics of her bisexuality, and sharing her love of trans women.

  • Television Casting Dancing With the Gay Stars

    NOM's Maggie Gallagher facing off with antigay Rep. Sally Kern? Neil Patrick Harris upstaging André Leon Talley? The Advocate makes its picks for the ultimate gay Dancing With the Stars lineup.

1037 COVER X135 | ADVOCATE.COM