|| News ||
1 2 3 NEXT  Page 1 of 3

N.Y. Marriage Lost ... For Now


DAVID PATERSON NY MARRIAGE X390 (GETTY IMAGES) | ADVOCATE.COM

The New York state senate on Wednesday voted down a marriage equality bill by a wide margin following months of delay and protracted political drama.

In a special legislative session, the senate voted 38-to-24 against the bill, eight votes short of a majority, with no support from Republican senators. A state assembly marriage bill had passed for a third time late last night.
 
Governor David Paterson, who made marriage equality a centerpiece of his agenda, issued a statement a few hours after the vote that acknowledged the widespread sense of disappointment among advocates for the bill.

“I believe in my heart that if people had voted their consciences today, we would be celebrating marriage equality tonight,” said Paterson. “That did not happen.”

The governor quickly sought to turn the discussion toward the future.

“As disappointed as we are today, let’s get up tomorrow and redouble our efforts,” said Paterson. “We are going to lay the foundation to make people feel comfortable to vote their conscience and not fear political backlash.”

The vote followed an emotional three-hour debate that included tears from the legislation’s lead sponsor, Senator Thomas K. Duane, who is gay, and tirade from Senator Ruben Diaz, Sr, a Pentecostal minister and Bronx Democrat Senator who called the bill "treason," and argued that marriage equality should be decided in a public referendum.
 
Speaking to reporters following the vote, Senator Duane said: "I wasn't expected to be betrayed, and so I have some justified anger. But it's just going to propel me to — I don't want to say redouble my efforts, because my efforts have been pretty strong — but I'm not going to let up."
 
New York City Council Speaker Christine Quinn, who is openly lesbian and lobbied intensely for the bill, echoed Duane's anger.
 
"I am mad," said Quinn, in a telephone interview late Wednesday afternoon as she returned from Albany. "There were people who had made promises and that's not where they ended up."
 
Still, the speaker said she was not caught off guard by the vote outcome.

"I knew when I went up to the gallery to watch the debate that we were likely to lose," said Quinn.
 
Win or lose, Empire State Pride Agenda, the state’s leading LGBT lobby, framed the result as a long-awaited opportunity to learn where legislators stand on the marriage equality issue.

"While we are disappointed by today’s vote, we are pleased that the issue of marriage equality at last was debated in the New York State Senate,” said executive director Alan Van Capelle in a statement issued shortly after the vote. “We had long called for a public debate on this matter so we could determine who was truly on our side.

“It is a step forward for our democratic process in New York that a debate and vote have now occurred,” said Van Capelle. “Now we know where we stand, and where we need to concentrate our efforts in the future.”

No Republican legislator voted for the bill, despite being freed by their minority leader, Senator Dean Skelos of Long Island, to vote their consciences.

The Log Cabin Republicans of New York issued a statement seeking to situate the outcome squarely on the shoulders of Democrats, however.

Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Twitter. Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Facebook. 1 2 3 NEXT  Page 1 of 3
Reader Comments
  • Name: Jake
    Date posted: 12/4/2009 11:10:05 AM
    Hometown: Long Beach

    Comment:

    Again, Conservative is on the Moon. He clearly doesn't read the news... doesn 't hear about the right's wingnut accusations du jour...... Anyway, discussing politics obviously is not your strong point, maybe you should stick to the rest: "porno, acting, writing, working out, reading, cooking, drinking, and getting and giving head."

  • Name: ThatGayConservative
    Date posted: 12/3/2009 10:34:03 PM
    Hometown: Santa Ana, CA

    Comment:

    Typical liberal doesn't want to talk just attack people personally, okay have it your way. No i don't care about googling people's SN because I don't plan on attacking people no matter what comes up. BYE

  • Name: Jake
    Date posted: 12/3/2009 6:51:35 PM
    Hometown: Long Beach

    Comment:

    Conservative, I feel so bad and embarrassed for you right now. Have you ever Googled your AIM SN? Thanks, but no thanks.

  • Name: ThatGayConservative
    Date posted: 12/3/2009 6:45:54 PM
    Hometown: Santa Ana, CA

    Comment:

    Jake, Believe me I am the first to speak in favor of SSM. I am against civil unions. I just think that our approach is more direct, compatible to the issue, and strictly intellectual in a positive manner in which we place the good of society as a whole first. Once you understand these tenets, you will understand why so many are against marriage equality and how many are instead for gay-marriage. You have to pick the right argument in order to win. I know you are an intelligent person and I know what you want to do is meaningful, but there are ways to do things and there are ways not to do things. However I invite you or any other person on this board to continue to discuss this with me further. I am online yahoo IM and AIM my SN is josesdream (yahoo) and MJoseOC (AIM).

  • Name: Jake
    Date posted: 12/3/2009 5:56:39 PM
    Hometown: Long Beach

    Comment:

    The thing is that it's not frustration about "The Issues." I, like a lot LGBTs, will shake my head at yesterday's events, but we'll keep on keeping on because it's the right thing to do. It's better than talking about Republican solutions. What it is is a pure frustration with people like you, the people who abandon what should be their cause replacing it with what's easier. I bet you'll be a happy camper when we achieve full equality, I bet you'll even tell your grandkids you helped. I really hope you can redeem yourself by making a difference in the world. Instead of buckling at the knees in the face of adversity, maybe you can learn it's possible to make a difference, to help evolve the way people feel about The Issues. I'd rather die a thousand times in pain than to settle for civil unions.

  • Name: ThatGayConservative
    Date posted: 12/3/2009 5:39:56 PM
    Hometown: Santa Ana, CA

    Comment:

    Jake, I don't offer meat and potatoes because I don't say what you want me to say. And I can articulate versus your verbal assault. I understand your frustration. But i don't understand the politics behind it. Read very slowly what I said about equality. If you couldn't understand what was said then that goes to show you how ambiguous this whole "equality" thing is. The bottom line is this: do you chose equality or marriage? I chose marriage because that is more feasible. I think that is what you want too, so I would suggest you do the same. Iraq as you know is taken over by zealous religious mullahs so it is way different then here. And when people do not accept SSM it doesn't mean that they are fascists. It means that we didn't make the argument. My rule of thumb is that fascism at its core is when you FORCE others to do something they are unwilling to do or say. I can say that is what the left is doing, trying to force me to pay for other people's mistakes. (Bailouts)

  • Name: ThatGayConservative
    Date posted: 12/3/2009 5:24:14 PM
    Hometown: Santa Ana, CA

    Comment:

    And also Jeffery: What else do you know about the "Family" besides whatever MADvocate wants you to believe. Here is what I know, "The Family" is one of many fraternities in Washington. There hundreds of them. And there many like the "Family" who are religious in nature which include dems and reps. I reject that this very small fraternity has any power over another nation. From what I understand is the Roman Catholic Church, a more powerful organization, that was behind the Uganda bill. Uganda executes gays at a smaller rate then say Iran. There is also persecutions of religious minorities in that country. Do they matter too? Yet this liberal congress still supports this regime with money and arms. Maybe is something the liberals should address in congress? Maybe they should get the courage to cut off anymore aid to that regime. I think that is better solution than to go after one small fraternity, only because its membership happens to be conservative.

  • Name: Jake
    Date posted: 12/3/2009 5:09:27 PM
    Hometown: Long Beach

    Comment:

    Conservative, will you please articulate? You rant and have no meat and potatoes. Also, please don't tell me I should leave anything on the battlefield, you ingrate. Fascist propaganda and rhetoric have done large amounts of injustice to the progress we must secure as a nation, that is why I'm upset. I am more upset with trolls like you... people who discount the rightful anger of New Yorkers. As far as what I fought in Iraq... it would probably be best classified as fascism... the conservative side of the spectrum. It looked all too familiar. Perhaps if you could get off your fascist monstertrucking free-market ass and pick up an M4 then you'll learn the importance of learning from other countries.

  • Name: ThatGayConservative
    Date posted: 12/3/2009 4:53:32 PM
    Hometown: Santa Ana, CA

    Comment:

    Mark, Now you really will piss of the DNC, since they are kings of taxes. I have a better idea why don't you support the GOP so we can lower your tax burden. Or is this not a serious discussion and all you want to do is make a dumb statement. And figuring what you said about weddings you also wish not to be invited to one, because the mere sight of a traditional wedding sickens you. After all your yammering, bitching, what achievement will come out of this? How will this lead anywhere? Point A (Yelling at a wedding) and Point B (state recognition of same sex marriage)

  • Name: ThatGayConservative
    Date posted: 12/3/2009 4:46:29 PM
    Hometown: Santa Ana, CA

    Comment:

    Jake, I would like to thank you for your service. However, I don't appreciate the aggression, maybe we should leave that in the battlefield. You say you are for equality, how much of it are you for? Just enough for us which is self-fulfilling or embrace "full equality" meaning no matter the person, he or she and they stand for, they in essence are equal to you? I don't believe in this equality hypothesis, just look at me, I'm not equal to you, you are liberal and I'm not, That is not equal. You serve, and I have not. That is not equal. And what about the KKK, skin heads and Nazis and their equal rights? In the name of equality are they equal to you and me? Well I know they are not equal to me at least. I reject them. And yes I know my history, that was my minor in college, so I will be happy to discuss our nations' history with you. You pick the topic... And fascism, isn't that what you were fighting against in Iraq? So why compare me to a fascist murderous dictator.

 PREVIOUS 1 2 3 4 5  ... NEXT  


Don't Miss
  • Best of Broadway Smash: Why You Will Love It

    Craig Zadan and Neil Meron, two of the producers of NBC’s new critically acclaimed musical series, explain why the backstage drama of creating a musical about Marilyn Monroe has mass appeal and why big stars like Anjelica Huston, Uma Thurman, Bernadette Peters, and Nick Jonas were eager to appear in it.

  • Best of Broadway How Broadway Does a Flea Market

    Find out why actress Kathleen Chalfant calls the annual Flea Market and Grand Auction in Times Square "the most glamorous flea market you've ever seen." It raised half a million dollars to fight HIV/AIDS.

  • Travel Slideshow Flag Gayest Cities in America, 2012

    It's no secret that megalopolises New York City, Chicago, and Los Angeles have robust LGBT life — and we've even heard tell of little queer hoods like the Castro and P-Town. This isn't that list.

 
 
Advocate Subscribe Promo Banner 300x50
 
Follow Us Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterSubscribe to our RSS feedsDownload our app
Facebook Activity
 
COVER 1055 X135 | ADVOCATE.COM
Today's Headlines