|| News ||
Page 1 of 1

FDA to Reconsider Ban on Gay Blood Donors


BLOOD SEX AND THE FDA X390 (MARIO WAGNER) | ADVOCATE.COM

Faced with increased pressure from gay advocates, lawmakers, and blood collection agencies, federal health officials will reexamine the 27-year-old ban on gay male blood donors —a prohibition that the American Red Cross and other groups have blasted in recent years as “scientifically and medically unwarranted.”

In a Friday statement, the Food and Drug Administration, a subagency of the Department of Health and Human Services that regulates the nation's blood collection system, announced that it is "considering the possibility of pursuing alternative strategies that maintain blood safety" and that its blood safety committee will reexamine the ban in June. The FDA last reconsidered the policy in 2006 but recommended no change in a lifetime ban for men who have had sex with other men since 1977, the Los Angeles Times reports.

In recent years several countries have eased blood donation policies, replacing lifetime bans with risk-based protocols regarding specific sexual practices, regardless of sexual orientation. But the FDA has historically rejected change in its policy: "When we reexamine the issue scientifically, we haven't seen data showing that altering the current [ban] could be accomplished without some degree of increased risk" of HIV-contaminated blood entering the nation's blood supply, Jay Epstein, director of the Office of Blood Research and Review for the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, told The Advocate in a November article.

The FDA statement comes a week after a group of 18 U.S. senators, led by Massachusetts senator John Kerry, penned a letter to  FDA officials calling for an end to an "outdated, medically and scientifically unsound" policy.

Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Twitter. Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Facebook. Page 1 of 1
Reader Comments
  • Name: David
    Date posted: 5/24/2010 3:51:09 PM
    Hometown: London, UK/Boston, MA

    Comment:

    Re: Dough Boston The idea that you'd reject giving blood because we weren't allowed to thirty years ago on the notion that "it wasn't good enough then" is rediculous and counter productive to the development and acceptance of the gay community. This isn't a question of us versus them. Remember thirty years ago they didn't know half of what they know about HIV then they do now. Their decision to ban gay blood was based out of hysteria not discrimination. heterosexuals have just as high a risk of contracting HIV as homosexual men do? And given that all blood is tested before its used I think its safe to say that they're beginning to realize that its rediculous to ban blood based on someone's orientation.

  • Name: Daniel Evans
    Date posted: 4/10/2010 11:57:14 AM
    Hometown: Monroe

    Comment:

    I just spent 20 minutes typing out a response and clicked outside the response box, the entire thing vanished. If I get the urge again, I'll type it all out again. :) The story is important, but I'm trying to find out exactly how to take action on this FDA regulation. I've been looking around regulations.gov, I'm new to this stuff. Please contact me at dwe427@gmail.com with information. Thanks -Dan

  • Name: Another atheist
    Date posted: 4/8/2010 1:14:28 PM
    Hometown: Seattle

    Comment:

    Wow, "Atheist". I'm sure glad there are people like you representing the non-religious community in America. I'd sure hate for people to think we were all heartless bastards or anything. You know who needs blood donations? Children. And non-Christians, too. If you're ever in the case of needing blood, I sure hope that whoever has your blood type didn't decide "Well people who my donation won't affect have oppressed me, so screw the world."

  • Name: Atheist
    Date posted: 3/15/2010 3:37:38 AM
    Hometown: Earth

    Comment:

    First, they pay reparations for two thousand years of oppression and defamation. When that happens, I consider giving my blood. Otherwise, they can kiss my gay ass.

  • Name: Doug
    Date posted: 3/14/2010 10:00:29 PM
    Hometown: Boston

    Comment:

    When society actively discrimnates against and denies civil rights to a minority there are no innocents. If the U.S. government apologizes for what they knew, even back then, was a boneheaded act of discrimination, then I might consider donating again. Otherwise, if my blood wasn't good enough for you 30 years ago, you don't need it now, either.

  • Name: Paschal
    Date posted: 3/14/2010 4:11:46 PM
    Hometown: Sligo, Ireland

    Comment:

    Anyone who wouldn't donate blood out of spite if the ban is lifted is truely crazy. My mother would have died of liver failure after my sister was born if it were not for the fact that she was given donated blood and I wouldn't have been born. Don't make innocent people suffer for the ignorance of others.

  • Name: Tod
    Date posted: 3/14/2010 7:07:09 AM
    Hometown: West Hollywood

    Comment:

    In the early days, if you knew the infection was primarily in one group it was logical to keep this group’s blood supply separate. Doing so would decrease the risk of contamination. However, today HIV infection crosses genders and sexual preferences. It’s a human war against a bad-ass virus that has been here before. But while gays are still on “the list” the newer potential “players” have not been added that may possibly allow the blood supply to become vulnerable and discriminates against gays. Control is foremost in blood screening, but also should be based on individual risk and not blanket an entire group that consists of millions of people of which a majority are not infected. This old policy is risky, uninformed and discriminatory.

  • Name: Dave
    Date posted: 3/13/2010 10:25:55 PM
    Hometown: Ottawa, Canada

    Comment:

    There's still the lawsuit going on in Canada about Kyle Freeman - a gay man who donated blood and is now being sued by Canada Blood Services. Search for it and you'll see the wobbly legs that these laws are standing on. We all know that straight people who have sex with a bisexual are still allowed to give blood. There is no difference between those people and gay men. They may not have had male to male sexual contact, but some of them have been in contact with people who have. It's outrageous and stupid.

  • Name: Luke
    Date posted: 3/13/2010 8:27:36 PM
    Hometown: Florence

    Comment:

    I have abstained from donating blood for many years because of this ban. Truthfully my abstention has more to do with the fact that I would have to be dishonest in order to donate than any of the reprehensible ideas earlier comments expressed. Should the ban be lifted this June I will gladly donate blood, so long as the gift is honestly given and accepted with grace.

  • Name: Cody
    Date posted: 3/13/2010 5:14:55 PM
    Hometown: Bloomington, IN

    Comment:

    If the FDA really wants to decrease its risk of receiving HIV+ blood, they need to ban black women from donating. This ban is outdated and does nothing but further discrimination, much like a ban on black women would.



Don't Miss
  • Best of Broadway Smash: Why You Will Love It

    Craig Zadan and Neil Meron, two of the producers of NBC’s new critically acclaimed musical series, explain why the backstage drama of creating a musical about Marilyn Monroe has mass appeal and why big stars like Anjelica Huston, Uma Thurman, Bernadette Peters, and Nick Jonas were eager to appear in it.

  • Best of Broadway How Broadway Does a Flea Market

    Find out why actress Kathleen Chalfant calls the annual Flea Market and Grand Auction in Times Square "the most glamorous flea market you've ever seen." It raised half a million dollars to fight HIV/AIDS.

  • Travel Slideshow Flag Gayest Cities in America, 2012

    It's no secret that megalopolises New York City, Chicago, and Los Angeles have robust LGBT life — and we've even heard tell of little queer hoods like the Castro and P-Town. This isn't that list.

 
 
Advocate Subscribe Promo Banner 300x50
 
Follow Us Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterSubscribe to our RSS feedsDownload our app
Facebook Activity
 
1056 COVER X135 | ADVOCATE.COM
Today's Headlines