|| News ||
Page 1 of 1

Judge: Wisconsin DP Registry OK


Julaine Appling X390 (SOURCED) | ADVOCATE.COM
Julaine Appling of Wisconsin Family Action

Wisconsin’s domestic-partnership registry does not violate the state constitution’s ban on same-sex marriage, a judge ruled Monday.

The decision is being touted as a victory for gay rights, although Dane County circuit judge Daniel Moeser’s ruling cites the fact that domestic partnerships, established in Wisconsin in 2009, convey far fewer rights and responsibilities than marriage.

“The state does not recognize domestic partnership in a way that even remotely resembles how the state recognizes marriage,” Moeser wrote. “Moreover, domestic partners have far fewer legal rights, duties, and liabilities in comparison to the legal rights, duties, and liabilities of spouses.”

Since the Wisconsin legislature set up the registry in 2009, about 1,700 couples have entered into domestic partnerships. In 2006 voters had approved a constitutional amendment outlawing same-sex marriage in the state.

Gov. Scott Walker, a first-term Republican, refused to defend the registry because he believed it was unconstitutional, and he told the court so in May, the Associated Press reports. However, the court had already heard arguments by then. His predecessor, Democrat Jim Doyle, had appointed private attorneys to defend the law after the state’s attorney general had declined to do so.

The conservative group Wisconsin Family Action, which brought the lawsuit against the registry, vowed to appeal Moeser’s decision as far as the state Supreme Court if necessary. “We’re going to work through the process and we will be appealing as we work to defend the constitution and the institution of marriage,” the group’s president, Julaine Appling, told AP.

Katie Belanger, director of gay rights organization Fair Wisconsin, which had intervened in the case to defend the registry, said her group is prepared for the appeal process, but Moeser’s ruling still makes it a “great day for Wisconsin.”

Read the full story here. 

Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Twitter. Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Facebook. Page 1 of 1
Reader Comments
  • Name: Anthony J Raiola
    Date posted: 6/21/2011 9:14:33 AM
    Hometown: Staten Island NY

    Comment:

    They can challenge the bill all they want. Anyone who challenges a civil and human right bill shows where the discrimination and bias is and who is a believer of it and will be known for being part of a discrimination and bias mission. I know I wouldn't want to be part of that kind of mission. Marriage is a contract between two people to love each other, respect each other and take care of each other for the rest of their lives....This has nothing to do with religion and I wish people would stop forcing religion down my throat. My God says "love one another as you would love yourself" and if I could marry myself I would....My God says "come as you are for you are my children and you are loved and accepted"...My God doesn't make mistakes which means I am not a mistake but a child of God who loves me. Why cant you?? What God do you follow?? There is only one God, called many names, but He is a God of love and acceptance of all his children.

  • Name: Larry
    Date posted: 6/21/2011 8:47:47 AM
    Hometown: Boston

    Comment:

    So is DP even a step lower than Civil Unions? 3rd class citizens now! No, you can't sit at the back of the bus but you can hang onto the roof rack if you like.

  • Name: Blake J
    Date posted: 6/21/2011 2:51:53 AM
    Hometown: Johannesburg

    Comment:

    My theory as to why so many women of her type are against homosexuality is that when homosexuality is accepted, more men will be open to acting on their bisexuality and these women would have even fewer men settling for them!

  • Name: Jerry
    Date posted: 6/21/2011 1:27:43 AM
    Hometown: Washington DC

    Comment:

    It's amazing how many of these bigots are fat-assed breeder broads

  • Name: Joseph
    Date posted: 6/20/2011 9:22:48 PM
    Hometown: Montgomery, AL

    Comment:

    So, does the GOP recognize its hypocrisy when it denounces Obama's DOJ for not supporting DOMA but says NOTHING when Scott Walker refuses to uphold a state law? Of course not. It was purely rhetorical, folks. Nothing more to see. Move along.

  • Name: Flick
    Date posted: 6/20/2011 9:02:01 PM
    Hometown: Chicago

    Comment:

    Well, Scott Walker... the king of all things constitutional and ethical has an opinion on this. Do these NOM people realize what a waste their lives are? This matter doesn't apply to them and they are fighting a losing battle. Nobody cares.



 
 
Advocate Subscribe Promo Banner 300x50
 
Follow Us Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterSubscribe to our RSS feedsDownload our app
Facebook Activity