|| News ||
Page 1 of 1

Marriage Equality Bill Stalled in N.Y. Senate


GREG BALL X390 (ball4ny.com) | ADVOCATE.COM
Greg Ball

The Republican Senate conference is scheduled to meet again Friday morning in New York, but with other business still to be completed, it remains unclear when the conference will discuss the marriage equality bill with amended language for religious protections and decide whether to bring it to the floor for a vote.

On Thursday, Senate majority leader Dean Skelos said he would present the measure to his members for consideration and he expected a “lengthy” conversation, a prospect that seems challenging on a Friday as lawmakers enter their fourth day of overtime in a session that was scheduled to end last Monday. 

Whether or not the marriage equality bill reaches the floor for a vote is the decision of the Republican Senate majority conference. Most of the members oppose the bill, but only one more vote, which must come from a Republican, would be needed for the measure to pass on the floor. The bill passed the Democratic-controlled Assembly last week, and Assembly speaker Sheldon Silver has indicated that the proposed religious exemption amendments would be acceptable to his chamber.


The marriage equality bill has been stalled for over a week in the Senate as public pressure and protests continue to mount at the capitol building in Albany. According to The Buffalo News, security was tightened late Thursday night over concern about the reaction of the bill’s opponents in the event the measure passes. 


Gov. Andrew Cuomo said this week he was "cautiously optimistic" the bill would pass, as he and the coalition of advocates have reached a "threshold" in securing 31 votes, from 29 Democrats and two Republicans. The governor has called for a vote on the bill, a sentiment that New Yorkers United for Marriage repeated Thursday after the Senate adjourned for the night.

"The Senate has adjourned for the evening, but we remain steadfast in our demand that the Senate uphold its obligation to the people of the State of New York and allow a vote on marriage equality and other legislative business before concluding the session and leaving town," said the statement.

Also Thursday, state senator Greg Ball, who garnered attention with his calls for more religious exemptions in the marriage equality bill, announced that he planned to vote no on the measure, although he said he believed it would pass.

Ball, a Republican from Putnam County who last week asked followers on Twitter how he should vote, confirmed his switch from undecided to opposed in a statement. He said that he pushed for stronger religious protections “knowing that marriage equality was likely to pass,” but apparently the final religious exemptions language negotiated between Gov. Andrew Cuomo and senate Republicans proved inadequate for him.

“Now that the final text is public, I am proud that I have secured some strong protections for religious institutions and basic protections for religious organizations,” he said. “The bill still lacks many of the basic religious protections I thought were vital, and for this reason, and as I did in the Assembly, I will be voting ‘no.’”

Contrary to his statement, the final religious exemptions language to be considered by the Republican senators, perhaps in conference Friday, has not been made public. A spokeswoman for Ball said Thursday that the senator mistakenly believed the language had been made public because he received so many questions about it.

Ball was not one of the three Republicans who met repeatedly with the governor’s office to negotiate the exemptions language, and his concerns about protections for religious businesses and individuals seemed to exceed the narrow issues that people familiar with the negotiations said were under discussion. Asked whether his change to a no vote indicated that protections for religious businesses and individuals were not included in the still-secret language, the Ball spokeswoman said, “That’s accurate, yes.”

The announcement from Ball leaves three Republican senators undecided, including Mark Grisanti, Andrew Lanza, and Stephen Saland. Lanza and Saland were part of the team that negotiated the religious exemptions language with Cuomo.

A spokesman for Cuomo has not responded to a request for comment about the religious exemptions.

Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Twitter. Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Facebook. Page 1 of 1
Reader Comments
  • Name: Ted Hayes
    Date posted: 6/24/2011 10:12:14 PM
    Hometown: Stone Ridge, NY

    Comment:

    The bill just passed 36-26.

  • Name: Ingrid
    Date posted: 6/24/2011 4:51:03 PM
    Hometown: Philly

    Comment:

    I just called the office of the senate leader Skelos. Here is his contact info, call him and tell them it's time to vote! Albany Office Legislative Office Building, Room 909 Albany, NY 12247 United States Phone: (518) 455-3171 Email address: skelos@nysenate.gov

  • Name: Andy P.
    Date posted: 6/24/2011 4:03:50 PM
    Hometown: Minneapolis, MN

    Comment:

    @ Juan That's always been my feeling about marriage equality: your average Republican doesn't really care about it. They know it's a hot button issue they can use to rally the support of the ignorant and religious zealots but they'd drop it in a heartbeat for a signed document swearing that the wealthy would never ever have to pay taxes again.

  • Name: Carol
    Date posted: 6/24/2011 3:28:10 PM
    Hometown: MO

    Comment:

    The republicans are riding high today in NYC, after Gov. Christies attack on the citizens of N.J.. The state workers; police, fireman, teachers, everyone in unions have been run over by the big man. A comment on one of the net news, said perhaps we need a labor party in the U.S., many people have been sayng we should have a third party lately. When the democrats have democrats voting with the republicans, who represents the middleclass? Something needs to change. Don't hold your breath about SS marriage being voted on today.

  • Name: Tim
    Date posted: 6/24/2011 2:46:42 PM
    Hometown: Baltimore

    Comment:

    If the majority of the Republican conference opposes it and they decide whether it's voted on by the whole Senate, why would they even allow it to be voted on (especially if there's an excellent chance it may pass)? Am I missing something here?

  • Name: dave
    Date posted: 6/24/2011 2:42:44 PM
    Hometown: austin

    Comment:

    they may be running the clock down so that they can vote and get out of town avoiding the press et all of course the same strategy works if they want to not vote on it too.

  • Name: will
    Date posted: 6/24/2011 12:56:34 PM
    Hometown: los angeles

    Comment:

    After getting a majority vote (32 - maybe more - reportedly yes votes now) it would just be spite and partisan politics not to bring this to the floor for a vote. I get this horrible feeling they're running out the clock.

  • Name: Johann of OC
    Date posted: 6/24/2011 11:58:17 AM
    Hometown: Orange County, CA

    Comment:

    I still have yet to understand why religious organizations who "openly" want to discriminate against a segment of society that pays taxes etc. are allowed tax exemption status..........in what parallel universe does this make sense to anyone with an IQ above zero..........the pandering of the republicans to this group is laughable..... I agree with Allie in the first comment..."Let's play ball" .....get out and vote and donate some money if you have it....but the vote is the most important....hopefully one day people will ask how the Churches were allowed to get away with this nonsense.....like the Inquisition.

  • Name: allie
    Date posted: 6/24/2011 11:29:57 AM
    Hometown: Richmond

    Comment:

    Skelos makes THE decision on Voting or Not. He can try to spread the blame, but in the end, if he refuses to allow it, then the LGBT community will collect $1 Million to defeat him in the next election, just like NOM has threatened to do. - Let's Play Ball!

  • Name: Daniel David
    Date posted: 6/24/2011 10:50:41 AM
    Hometown: Los Angeles

    Comment:

    It's a political tug-all: pre-election fodder. Welcome to THE MARRIAGE MASH.



 
 
Advocate Subscribe Promo Banner 300x50
 
Follow Us Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterSubscribe to our RSS feedsDownload our app
Facebook Activity