|| News ||
1 2 NEXT  Page 1 of 2

The State of LGBTs in Charlotte

Advocate contributor Matt Comer says the Democratic National Convention can do more than bring money to Charlotte. It can shine the spotlight on the city's poor record on LGBT rights.


CHARLOTTE DNC X390 | ADVOCATE.COM

The Democratic National Committee’s decision Tuesday to have the party’s 2012 national convention in Charlotte is a positive for North Carolina and its largest city. In addition to bringing national and global attention and financial resources to the city and state, Charlotte’s hosting of the convention serves as a unique and rare opportunity for local and national LGBT leaders alike.

In case you aren’t familiar with Charlotte, let me provide a quick introduction. We’re the largest city between Atlanta and Washington, D.C., and home to the nation’s largest bank, Bank of America. Our NFL team is the Carolina Panthers, and the NASCAR Hall of Fame recently opened here. Oh, and one last thing: Charlotte is not a friendly place for LGBT people.

Though Charlotte is progressive and accepting in many social and business circles, its political and religious landscapes offer little comfort to LGBT citizens. Democratic candidates and elected officials have never considered LGBT equality anything more than an election year talking point delivered to carefully selected audiences. Locals have only two substantial pieces of pro-LGBT law on which to rely, both of those passed by the county as Democratic city leaders, despite their majority on city council, have continued their decades-old stalling techniques.

“But it’s an election year." "The mayor would veto it." "I just don’t have the support," they said. Year after year, any attempt by LGBT residents at forward movement has been blocked by cold shoulders, dead ends and half-cocked solutions and sound bites to appease and quiet us.

By any measure of comparison — with the three other convention finalist cities, with similarly sized cities in the South, or even with Carolina cities and towns with populations as small as 5,000 — Charlotte fails with regard to LGBT inclusion: City employees lack basic protections against discrimination  on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, employees lack domestic-partner benefits that would enable them to care for their loved ones and children, LGBT people have no significant representation on council or any of its boards, and city agencies like the police department have little to no experience dealing with LGBT people.

Mecklenburg County commissioner Bill James, a dinosaur held over from the days when county officials ended all public arts funding after a local staging of Angels in America, serves as a prime example of the anti-LGBT hostility present here. In December and January he made national news for his comments comparing LGBT people to sexual predators and pedophiles. Though extreme, James’s comments are more than familiar to locals, yet he remains in office year after year, and his commission colleagues did not have the courage to officially address his behavior head-on.

Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Twitter. Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Facebook. 1 2 NEXT  Page 1 of 2
Reader Comments
  • Name: Derrick Mathis
    Date posted: 2/4/2011 11:10:16 PM
    Hometown: Los Angeles

    Comment:

    As much as I try and would like to, the LGBT press just will not let me respect them. Take for example this headline and what it implies: "When the Democrats come to Charlotte, the LGBTs won't be welcome." It implies that the DNC will be unwelcoming to LGBTs come convention time in Charlotte. That's not what the article is about. WTF?!? So the Advocate is doing switch and bait these days? I know many LGBT blogs lack integrity. Now I know the Advocate is among them. Pathetic.

  • Name: david hioard
    Date posted: 2/4/2011 5:22:51 PM
    Hometown: cleveland, ohio

    Comment:

    Hopefully this will energize the LGBT community in Charlotte. While some individuals may feel welcome in their own circles, until you are all accepted at every level, it is meaningless. When I came out in the early 90's in Charlotte, I was fired from a high level position with the City of Charlotte, with no recourse. A promising carreer ended. It sounds like nothing has changed. I chose to move to a city where I am welcomed because I am gay, and this includes church. I agree with those who feel the Democrats should not have chosen Charlotte because of its LGBT stance and its unioln stance. Shame on them for not standing on their principles. I will be there visiting my kids in Sept 2012. Lets be out and see if we can make a difference!

  • Name: Out in Charlotte
    Date posted: 2/4/2011 9:37:06 AM
    Hometown: Charlotte, NC

    Comment:

    I lived in Asheville, NC and Chapel Hill, NC prior to moving to Charlotte in 1997 and finally coming out in 2001. While our elected officials continue to put the usual spin on LGBT issues, I have found Charlotte to be a very welcoming and comfortable home to be an openly out lesbian. I believe that the way we can change the world is by simply living our lives and letting our friends, neighbors and colleagues see us as regular, ordinary citizens who want to live our lives just as they do. And, incidentally, I am a Republican.

  • Name: Raphael
    Date posted: 2/3/2011 10:42:48 PM
    Hometown: World

    Comment:

    I would say that the author is missing a very important point, the DNC chose Charlotte which by your own admission is anti-gay. What does this tell you about the Democrats who will be visiting your city if they did not strike the city off for these very same policies, which according to your President are anti-democratic. If they could overlook these things during the selection process, then get used to it, they are not going to help you in any way shape or form, maybe then they will get rid of Obahma and put someone more willing to fight for your rights. You've elected your black president and he has proven that he is all words and no action and for the next two years you will be fighting to protect what little you do have. Maybe its time to elect the woman who has already shown she has bigger gonads than Obahma. Whe Hillary has expressed her opinion, she has also said it was the individual states decision to set the conditions of marriage, not the federal government.

  • Name: mike
    Date posted: 2/3/2011 6:34:25 PM
    Hometown: chicago

    Comment:

    “But it’s an election year." "The mayor would veto it." "I just don’t have the support," they said. Year-after-year, any attempt by LGBT community members at forward movement has been blocked by cold shoulders, dead ends and half-cocked solutions and sound bites to appease and quiet us." Hmmm...sounds awfully familiar on a national level....



 
 
Advocate Subscribe Promo Banner 300x50
 
Follow Us Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterSubscribe to our RSS feedsDownload our app
Facebook Activity