News
2006-10-17
Justice Scalia
spars with head of ACLU
U.S. Supreme
Court justice Antonin Scalia on Sunday defended some of his
high court opinions, arguing that nothing in the
Constitutio
U.S. Supreme
Court justice Antonin Scalia on Sunday defended some of his
high court opinions, arguing that nothing in the
Constitution supports abortion or gay rights or the
use of race in school admissions. Scalia, a leading
conservative voice on the court, sparred in a one-hour
televised debate with American Civil Liberties Union
president Nadine Strossen.
The Reagan
appointee said unelected judges have no place deciding
politically charged questions when the Constitution is
silent on those issues. Arguing that liberal judges in
the past improperly established new political rights
such as abortion, Scalia warned, ''Someday you're
going to get a very conservative Supreme Court and regret
that approach.''
''On
controversial issues on stuff like homosexual rights,
abortion, we [the people] debate with each other and
persuade each other and vote on it either through
representatives or a constitutional amendment,'' Scalia
said. ''Whether it's good or bad is not my job. My job is
simply to say if those things you find desirable are
contained in the Constitution."
Strossen
countered that such a legal approach would have barred the
landmark 1954 ruling in Brown v. Board of
Education, a unanimous decision outlawing racial
segregation in public schools. ''There are some rights
that are so fundamental that no majority can take them
away from any minority, no matter how small or
unpopular that minority might be,'' she said. ''And who is
better positioned to represent and defend and be the
ultimate backstop for rights of individuals and
minorities than those who are not directly accountable
in the electoral process—namely federal judges?''
The ACLU debate
comes as the Supreme Court this term will hear cases
on divisive issues such as partial-birth abortion and
school integration. They are expected to test the
conservative impact of the court's two newest members,
Chief Justice John Roberts and Samuel Alito.
Scalia, 70, has
consistently voted to limit the use of race in school
admissions and has called for the 1973 Roe v.
Wade decision establishing a woman's right to abortion
to be overruled. But his influence was often limited
by moderate Sandra Day O'Connor, who cast deciding
votes on those issues against him.
With O'Connor now
retired and Alito succeeding her, Scalia—whom
President Bush passed up for chief justice—will
have new opportunities to try to sway his new
colleagues and centrist Anthony Kennedy over to his
viewpoints.
During Sunday's
debate, Scalia outlined his judicial philosophy of
interpreting the Constitution according to its text, as
understood at the time it was adopted. He reiterated
that race has no place in school admissions, a
viewpoint that put him on the losing side in 2003.
''The
Constitution very clearly forbids discrimination on the
basis of race,'' Scalia said in response to a question
by moderator Pete Williams of NBC. ''It doesn't seem
to me to allow Michigan to say we think it's good to
discriminate on the basis of race when you want to make sure
everyone is exposed to different backgrounds. We cannot use
race as the test of diversity.''
Scalia, who
marked his 20th anniversary on the court last month,
generally finds himself taking the opposite position to the
ACLU. Most notably, he wrote a majority 5–4
opinion last term giving police more leeway to enter
private homes.
He also
unsuccessfully sided with the government in cases where the
court struck down Ten Commandments displays in
Kentucky courthouses and declared that the military
commissions President Bush established to try
suspected al-Qaida members were unconstitutional.
But during
Sunday's debate, Scalia noted there were cases in which he
and the ACLU agreed. They included rulings upholding
the right to flag burning and a 2004 opinion
arguing that a U.S. citizen seized in Afghanistan in
wartime could challenge his detention as an enemy
combatant in U.S. courts.
Strossen, who
enjoys a friendly relationship with Scalia despite their
differences, applauded those opinions but added, ''I don't
want you to think you're too popular with this
group.'' ''I'm very distressed about your failure to
find protections in the Constitution for the right of
consenting individuals in their homes to decide what they
see and read, and what type of sexual relations they
have,'' she said as hundreds of ACLU audience members
cheered.
Scalia, who has
at times had a prickly relationship with the media,
agreed to have C-SPAN televise Sunday's event live—a
more recent accommodation as the court begins to show
greater signs of openness under Roberts. (AP)
Click here to follow The Advocate on Twitter.
Page 1 of 1