As they court the
evangelicals who have become so crucial to their party,
Republican presidential candidates are stepping into the
middle of a family fight.
Christian
conservative activists are more split than ever over whether
to keep the movement's focus on abortion, marriage,
and sexual chastity—or scrap that approach as
too narrow.
The founders of
the religious right, now in the twilight of their
leadership, see even the suggestion of expanding the agenda
as a dangerous distraction. In public, and sometimes
in personal ways, they are trying to beat back the
challenge.
''It's an ongoing
debate within the house of evangelicals,'' said Michael
Cromartie, vice president of the Ethics and Public Policy
Center, a conservative Washington think tank. ''It's
about how evangelicals present themselves in the
public arena.''
In November, some
Christian conservatives condemned pastor and
best-selling author Rick Warren for inviting Sen. Barack
Obama to speak at an AIDS summit at his church. Obama,
campaigning for the Democratic presidential
nomination, supports abortion rights.
Just this month,
Focus on the Family founder James Dobson and 24 other
top Christian conservatives pressured the National
Association of Evangelicals to silence its Washington
director, the Reverend Rich Cizik. The reason: Cizik
tried to convince evangelicals that global warming is
real.
The board of the
association not only stood by Cizik, it then moved on to
endorse a critique of U.S. policy toward terror detainees
called ''An Evangelical Declaration Against Torture:
Protecting Human Rights in an Age of Terror.''
Evangelicals, who mostly have a conservative world view
to match their theology, rarely speak out against the
policies of a Republican president—especially
one at war.
It's unclear who
will win the evangelical power struggle, but Michael J.
Gerson, a former speechwriter for President Bush, says
candidates in the 2008 race must consider the
divisions when crafting an appeal to evangelicals.
According to national exit polling, white evangelicals or
born-again Christians were about one quarter of the
electorate in 2004. Nearly 80% voted for Bush.
''I think there
is a little bit of an element of revolt against the tone
of some political engagement of the religious right in the
past, which seemed quite harsh,'' says Gerson, who
supports taking on a broader set of issues. ''I think
conservative candidates for president are going to
have to have a strong international agenda of compassion,
whether it's AIDS or malaria or girls' education or
other issues, in order to appeal to a significant
portion of evangelical opinion.''
The one leading
presidential contender who appears to comprehend this,
Gerson says, is Obama. The Democratic senator's appearance
at Warren's AIDS conference demonstrates that.
Yet it would be
wrong to dismiss the older generation and its tighter
focus just yet.
Even though the
Moral Majority is gone and the Christian Coalition is
floundering, the reverends Jerry Falwell, 73, and Pat
Robertson, 76, who formed the groups, still have
clout.
Falwell's Liberty
University is thriving, educating thousands of
conservative Christians. Robertson still has his TV
ministry. And the American Center for Law and Justice,
which Robertson founded to advocate for religious
freedom, is popular in conservative circles.
Focus on the
Family founder James Dobson, 71, only recently started a
political advocacy group but has quickly become one of the
most influential evangelicals in that area.
GOP candidates,
many lacking strong evangelical backgrounds, have been
flocking to the men.
Arizona senator
John McCain gave last year's commencement address at
Liberty University. Former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani
and former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney are
scheduled to speak soon at Robertson's Regent
University.
Former House
speaker Newt Gingrich just went on Dobson's radio program to
confess and seek forgiveness for an extramarital affair
Gingrich engaged in as he pursued President
Clinton's impeachment in the Monica Lewinsky scandal.
Gingrich is considering a presidential run and will be
Liberty's commencement speaker in May.
''These figures
are moving off the stage, but they're by no means
inconsequential. They're symbols in their own right,'' said
John Green, a senior fellow with the Pew Forum on
Religion and Public Life. ''They still have good
reputations, particularly with evangelicals who are
politically active. There are candidates who want to be seen
with these people.''
Still, none of
the men can be kingmaker—delivering the evangelical
vote and the GOP nomination to a favored candidate.
The organizational muscle of the movement—once
controlled by national groups linked to Falwell,
Robertson, and a few others—now lies with local
pastors, who were key to Bush's 2004 reelection win. A
large number of Christian conservatives have become
GOP insiders; white evangelicals form more than one third of
the party's base.
Divisions among
evangelicals will matter less after a nominee emerges.
Recent history
has shown that conservative Christians generally back the
Republican in the general election. Many feel they have no
alternative. At least until then, presidential
candidates have a complicated road ahead.
''It's an
extraordinarily positive step and development for Christian
conservatives,'' said Martin, a Rice University sociologist.
''It's a sign not of weakness but of maturity.'' (AP)
Click here to follow The Advocate on Twitter.
Page 1 of 1