On May 30 three
Soulforce activists were rejected by the Minnesota
National Guard because of the U.S. military’s antigay
“don’t ask, don’t tell”
policy. This would-be recruit--an organizer of this
spring’s Equality Ride--is dead serious about
signing up, and she’ll be back at the
recruiting office later this summer with reinforcements.
Never before have
I been the first in the history of this country to do
anything. But on May 30, I had the chance to say to myself,
Here is something new under the sun.
The U.S.
military’s “don’t ask, don’t
tell” policy created the opportunity for Jake
Reitan, Ezekiel Montgomery, and myself to be among the
first openly gay people to attempt to be accepted by the
armed forces. And so on that Tuesday we three
presented ourselves at a Twin Cities–area
recruiting center and offered to start the enlistment
process for the Armed Services.
“Don’t ask” is a federal law, spawned
in 1993 under President Bill Clinton, which prohibits
openly gay, lesbian, or bisexual people from serving
in the military. Not only does it forbid such a person from
signing up for duty, it also sets up ground for dismissal
for the estimated 65,000 LGB soldiers currently in the
military. (Being transgender is a separate issue
altogether under military policy).
Yet the
military’s own recruitment handbook is ambiguous. An
enlistment interview may abruptly end if an applicant
has three convictions for driving under the influence,
but it does not officially end if the applicant says,
“I am gay.” And “don’t ask,
don’t tell”--in theory at least--forbids
recruiters from asking applicants about their sexuality.
Yet on the
morning of May 30--even before we began the application
process--an officer unequivocally stated to the press that
the enlistment process would be cut short for any
applicants who stated they were openly gay or lesbian.
But when the process would end exactly remained in
question.
So the three of
us entered the Minnesota National Guard office, sat
through the interview, filled out forms, and answered
questions about our health, education, drug use, and
other things. The rule in practice works like this: If
at the end of the enlistment interview there is no reason
for disqualification other than sexual orientation, the
applicant is informed that he or she is rejected based
on the military’s prohibition against
“homosexual conduct”--but is also told of his
or her right to an appeal.
According to the
military, an appeal consists of a statement and two
letters of recommendation in which the recruit provides
evidence that he or she is not actually gay in order
to gain a “favorable decision.” As such,
there is no existing appeal format for Jake, Ezekiel, and
me. We will draft our own kind of appeal this summer
in which we tell the military why we are qualified,
openly gay applicants.
Let me be clear
about my sincere intention to serve: I will enlist with
honor and purpose. I will serve my country with pride, but I
will do it only as an openly gay woman.
Click here to follow The Advocate on Twitter.
Page 1 of 3
Herrin and the other Soulforce volunteers filed
first-person reports from the road during this
spring’s Equality Ride, during which 30-plus
LGBT and straight young people visited college campuses
hostile to openly queer students. Find their
dispatches at http://www.advocate.com/exclusive_detail_ektid29831.asp
For more information on Soulforce visit http://www.soulforce.org.