|| News ||
Page 1 of 1

Reuniting Families Act Introduced

Rep. Michael Honda of California held a noon press conference Thursday in Washington, D.C., in which he announced introduction this week of the Reuniting Families Act, a comprehensive immigration package that includes allowing gay Americans to sponsor their partners for residency.


Rep. Michael Honda of California held a noon press conference Thursday in Washington, D.C., in which he announced introduction this week of the Reuniting Families Act, a comprehensive immigration package that includes allowing gay Americans to sponsor their partners for residency.

The bill's Senate companion, introduced in the Senate Wednesday by Sen. Robert Menendez of New Jersey, excludes the provision to end discrimination against same-sex partners.

The Senate Judiciary Committee also held its first hearings Wednesday on a separate, stand-alone immigration bill that would end discrimination against LGBT families, the Uniting American Families Act, which has been introduced in both the House and Senate.

Altogether, four immigration bills are in process, three of which include protections for binational same-sex partners and their children.

A spokesperson for Immigration Equality, a group that lobbies on behalf of same-sex couples, called the inclusion of LGBT families in Representative Honda's bill "historic."

"This bill has the largest coalition of immigrant and civil rights groups supporting it that I have seen in a long time," said Steve Ralls, Immigration Equality director of communications. "This is momentous for our community as a whole to be included with this broad coalition in a bill that will set the tone for comprehensive immigration reform."

Ralls said they were "disappointed" that Senator Menendez chose to exclude gay partners from the Senate version of the bill, but noted that the Democratic senator is a sponsor of the stand-alone legislation. "We are grateful for his support of UAFA," he said.

The U.S. Conference on Catholic Bishops has mounted a strong campaign against including LGBT families in the omnibus immigration legislation.

Bishop John C. Wester of Salt Lake City, chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' Committee on Migration, wrote letters to both Honda and Menendez expressing his opposition to the Uniting American Families Act.

"Including UAFA in the Reuniting Families Act would erode the institution of marriage and family by according marriage-like immigration benefits to same-sex relationships, a position that is contrary to the very nature of marriage, which predates the church and the state," Wester wrote to Honda. His letter to Menendez indicated that the Senate version had his full support because it excluded UAFA.

The White House is expected to convene a summit on the omnibus legislation within the next few weeks, and LGBT inclusion in that package is shaping up to be a contentious part of the debate.

Rep. Barney Frank of Massachusetts has expressed pessimism for UAFA's prospects.

"You got two very tough issues -- the rights of same-sex couples and immigration," he told the Washington Blade last month. "You put them in the same bill, and it becomes impossible. We just don't have the votes for it."

But Ralls added that Frank has indicated he will push LGBT inclusion in the bill behind the scenes.

"Congressman Frank has told us that he supports including us in comprehensive immigration reform, and that's what's important because congressional leaders will look to Congressman Frank on that issue," Ralls said.

Click here to follow The Advocate on Twitter. Page 1 of 1
Reader Comments
  • Name: M
    Date posted: 6/18/2009 4:00:00 PM
    Hometown: Northern California

    Comment:

    I never thought I would be married and didn't really care about my rights. I was raised by rebels of the 60s and always figured I would do it my own way. Do I care now that I am being forced to leave the country with the love of my life? I'm furious and ashamed of my country! We are college educated, pay taxes, work for community non-profits and invest heavily in our community on top of donating more than 25% of our salaries to good causes. We are simply average, responsible citizens trying to live the American dream. Might I add that we also lead a an active spiritual and religious life in a very welcoming Jewish community. So within a year we will be living in Israel - the middle east - where I will be afforded the civil rights we just can't seem to find here. It's really hard to continue turning the other cheek and loving your neighboor when they keep crapping on your lawn. Time to hop off your high horse, Americans, before you've run everyone out of town.

  • Name: Jasmin
    Date posted: 6/9/2009 7:30:00 AM
    Hometown: UK

    Comment:

    Amanda - your ridiculously childish behaviour is hilarious. First, I'd suggest you watch 'Religulous' and second, may your 'God' never close any borders for you... all the best.

  • Name: Larry
    Date posted: 6/5/2009 3:58:00 PM
    Hometown: Sherman Oaks

    Comment:

    Its a sad fact of life in this country that the religous right simply cannot tolerate that there are people (thousands of us) who have same sex attraction. They will continue their venue of intolerance because of their "moral" values. We will have to fight for the right to be equal in the eyes of the government, and demand our civil rights, the religous right be damned! Jesus Christ would be on OUR side.

  • Name: West Irish
    Date posted: 6/5/2009 9:40:00 AM
    Hometown: Westchester, NY

    Comment:

    Amanda - you are clueless. The UAFA is not an 'amnesty' bill, nor is it a 'marriage' bill. It would subject the American citizen who is sponsoring their permanent partner to the same rigorous interview process - and $250,000 in fines and up to five years in jail for fraud. There is absolutely no way you can justify that this has anything to do with illegal immigration. It doesn't. When opposite-sex couples get married, they receive over 1100 rights at the Federal level. This bill would grant 1, that's right ONE of those rights to same-sex couples in a bi-national relationship. The head of the NAACP gave testimony in support of this bill, clearly pointing out that this is a Civil Rights issue.

  • Name: Jay
    Date posted: 6/4/2009 11:47:00 PM
    Hometown: Nashville, TN

    Comment:

    Amanda from Atlanta wrote: "The problem with all of this in general is the fact that "God" has been put on the back burner and people are just acting at there on will and not he will of "God" or the bible." ---I don't understand the sentence that reads "people are just acting at there on will and not he will". Is that a secrect code?--- Amanda from Atlanta wrote: "It is illegal , for a man to marry a man, and a woman to marry a woman and it should be. It is unethical by law of the bible and should not be forced onm the rest of the world. " --Firstly, "bible" is capitalized. And it is not illegal in many places in the world, and the United States. And nothing's being "forced onm" anyone. You are not required to marry a gay person. Thank you.

  • Name: Rich
    Date posted: 6/4/2009 11:12:00 PM
    Hometown: Greenwich, NY

    Comment:

    Amanda, stop forcing your Bible on me. And while you're doing that, try getting a clue..this is the 21st century, some of us are rational human beings and don't give one whit for your fantasy life, especially when you use it to justify discrimination against me and my family. Try reading a newspaper sometime.

  • Name: Amanda
    Date posted: 6/4/2009 7:54:00 PM
    Hometown: Atlanta

    Comment:

    The problem with all of this in general is the fact that "God" has been put on the back burner and people are just acting at there on will and not he will of "God" or the bible. If we keep letting all of these people into the United States what happens to our children. We are already over crowded and paying taxes for those that cannot find work to joing our medicaid and healthcare programs. Those that come here illegally get more help than those of us that have been here all of our lives. Close the borders, there should be harsher laws for those breaking the law. It is illegal , for a man to marry a man, and a woman to marry a woman and it should be. It is unethical by law of the bible and should not be forced onm the rest of the world.

  • Name: Shelby
    Date posted: 6/4/2009 4:24:00 PM
    Hometown: Oklahoma City, OK

    Comment:

    David is very correct - it is crucial. I am very much in support of gay marriage, but I wish we weren't so completely focused on marriage that it casts a shadow over this important issue. Gay American couples get to go to the store together, see a movie, visit family, enjoy holidays together, and wake up in the morning to a hug and a kiss whether they are legally married or not, but the situation that we are in lets us visit once in a while when our budget allows, enjoy a cup of coffee together over a webcam, or text one another to say "Merry Christmas and tell your mom hello from me". I am well educated, but I could not earn enough there to live and repay my student loans here. He is well educated, but has no "recognized" legitimate basis that will get approval for a visa here. We are committed to being together only through legal means - we want to do it the right way, but there simply is no "right way" for gay people in our current immigration law.

  • Name: David
    Date posted: 6/4/2009 3:40:00 PM
    Hometown: San Diego

    Comment:

    For those of us involved in committed relationships with someone living outside the US, this is crucial. My boyfriend cannot even come here to visit, I have to go to Mexico to spend time with him. Visitor's visas are turned down more than granted, especially if the applicant has any ties to the US. Even if we get married in Canada, the US still sees him as a Mexican citizen and will not let him stay here. I hope that Barney Frank gets on board and shows a little more positive attitude. I also hope that people write their representatives and senators to urge them to vote for fairness and equality. And the churches need to stay out of this. It's simply none of their business.

  • Name: Shelby
    Date posted: 6/4/2009 1:23:00 PM
    Hometown: Oklahoma City, OK

    Comment:

    What gets me is that those that the religious opposition to this bill want gays to stay away from the word "marriage" because it is "their word" and they somehow own it, but they don't want to allow an alternative either. I understand that the dream come true for them would be for the LGBT community to just disappear, but that is obviously not going to happen. This bill acts as a "meet in the middle" approach - we don't ask for the title of "married", but we do ask for the right to unify our families based on another term - "permanent partnership". It seems like a compromise that would fix a problem and still reserve the word "marriage" for heterosexuals to abuse.



More Online Only
  • Commentary What Marriage in Maine Meant for Me

    Dana Hernandez is a straight white married mother of two young children. But in campaigning for No on 1 and reporting Election Night outcomes for Advocate.com, defeat hit her like a ton of bricks.

  • Marriage Equality Video Content Flag Terri White Stages Her Leather Encore

    Last year, acclaimed stage performer Terri White was homeless and living in a public park. On Sunday, she and her partner held a leather-themed commitment ceremony onstage following her triumphant Broadway turn in Finian’s Rainbow. 

  • Music Ghost Story

    Out singer-songwriter Brandi Carlile discusses working with her childhood mentor, coming out publicly, and joining next year's Lilith Fair.

  • News View From Washington: GOP Upheaval

    Now that the only pro-marriage equality candidate in New York's 23rd Congressional district, Republican Dede Scozzafava, has dropped out of the race, Tuesday's election holds any number of political lessons for both the GOP and the LGBT community.

  • Books Hot Sheet: Ditto Knocking 'Em Dead

    This week might not bring anything to the screen other than a Boondock Saints sequel, but there are plenty of reasons to sit at home on the couch or head to your local concert venue.

  • News Features Sailor Speaks Out

    Sailor Joseph Rocha endured years of hazing until he spoke out — then he was discharged for revealing his homosexuality. Nonetheless, the 23-year-old is itching to suit back up.

  • Music Rainbow High

    Busy Broadway heartthrob, gay rights activist, and former Advocate coverboy Cheyenne Jackson chats about his Finian’s Rainbow revival, his politically charged cabaret CD, and laying around in his underpants (pic on page five).

  • Television Another Tough Broad

    After being outed by a Nazi and locking lips with a hook-up three times in one episode, Christine Woods's tough-talking FBI agent Janis Hawk on ABC's FlashForward might just be prime time's best gay offering — who isn't in Glee club, that is.

  • Books Video Content Flag In Sickness and in Health

    Mary Cappello’s memoir Called Back takes readers on a white-knuckle journey through the experience of cancer treatment in America — especially disorienting to navigate as a woman and a lesbian.

  • Books An American Crime

    Best-selling novelist Patricia Cornwell made headlines last week when she filed suit against a New York investment firm for losing $40 million of her money. But she'd much rather talk about her new book, hate-crimes legislation, and Angelina Jolie.

  • Comedy Gilded Lily

    After conquering Broadway, movies, and television, out funny lady Lily Tomlin prepares for the final frontier — Las Vegas.

  • Entertainment News Ricky Martin, No Shirt and a Baby

    Ricky Martin knows how to get the camera's attention. Take a look at the many pictures of Ricky uploaded to his Twitter account in the past three months, always shirtless, frequently carrying one (or both) of his babies.

  • Television Fresh Blood

    With True Blood a bona-fide cultural phenomenon, producer Alan Ball offers tantalizing hints about what to expect on season 3.

Most Popular Stories