Continental promo
|| Home > Commentary  ||
 

The gay agenda revealed!

We know there’s an antigay agenda: They want us gone, period. But a “gay agenda”? Can we all even agree on anything? Yes. In fact, the gay agenda is familiar to every schoolchild: liberty and justice for all
An Advocate.com exclusive posted February 22, 2005

We’ve heard about it for years. Many have tried to define it, including 22 organizations that released a combined statement in January 2005 to outlets such as Advocate.com. It’s the Gay Agenda, and while many pontificate about it, condemn it, or allegedly try and further it, I as a gay man have yet to figure out what it is.

Actually, let me flat-out say it: There is no gay agenda. I hate to break it to all those antigay organizations out there that have made such a myth the bedrock of their bigotry campaigns, but really, it just doesn’t exist.

Those who think it does are giving gays and lesbians too much credit. For there to be a gay agenda, there would have to be immense unity among us, since we would have to agree across the globe on said agenda. It might even have to be put up for a vote. Only then could it be disseminated to community leaders as well as the millions of gays and lesbians scattered across the world.

Frankly, that does not, will not, and cannot happen.

Gays and lesbian are a diverse community, composed of many voices with many ideas on how to achieve goals. We don’t all agree on any issue, be it same-sex marriage or the usefulness of pride festivals. We’re not all of the same political ideology (yes, for some reason, there are still gay Republicans—but then again, the world is filled with oxymorons), and many of us still keep our sexuality private or hidden. No, there is no consensus among us, let alone an agenda.

Yet bigots on all sides attack this “gay agenda” every chance they get. Just two weeks ago, in a small community outside of the very liberal city of Santa Cruz, Calif., it was debated, screamed about, and politicized in the name of “the children.” Seems that a few gay teachers, to promote diversity, put up posters in their classrooms that included same-sex couples, and a parent wanted them removed. Community forums followed, held in gymnasiums, ripe with the typically hateful religious rhetoric about how gays want to indoctrinate young minds, which was countered by the weaker calls for diversity and tolerance. Newspapers printed editorials. Radio shows debated (I did two; in one, a caller said that all of us gays should be put on a barge in the Pacific...but he didn’t want us hurt; how kind). Parents yelled.

It was during one of these shows that something struck me: Why do we always have to talk about the gay agenda? How about talking about the antigay agenda? Because while it is debatable as to whether we have a firm plan, there can be no doubt about the existence of an organized, crystal-clear antigay one.

Indeed, let’s dispel a few myths propagated by our opponents: They are quick to say “You can be who you want, just don’t force it on us” or “We don’t hate you--we simply wish that you keep your lifestyle away from our children,” plus plenty of other venomous remarks masquerading as tolerance. The fact is that they don’t only want gays and lesbians to shut up--they want us gone. Most would fire up the ovens if they thought they could get away with it, doing away once and for all with the blight of gays and lesbians--let the fires of hell claim those evildoers now instead of at death.

When the president of the United States talks about the “protection” of marriage, what he’s really talking about is equivalent to a big federal NO stamp placed on the foreheads of each gay and lesbian American. It’s not about marriage--it’s about the need to smack us back down because we’re getting too uppity. When school boards get upset at posters about tolerance or over gay-straight alliances, it has nothing to do with parental choice concerning what their children are taught in school--it’s about their denial that any of their kids could be gay. They don’t want their kids to know about gays, because they wish we didn’t exist. Period. End of story.

The antigay agenda is theocratic, rooted in the turn-or-burn teachings of an antiquated book of fables from 2,000 years ago. We are the subjects of the last bastion of sanctioned bashing--the one group, all those outside of it can agree, it is all right to oppose--because, of course, it’s not humans but God who said homosexuality is wrong, and He can’t be questioned.

So while the gay agenda might not be clearly defined, there can be no doubt what the antigay agenda is: removal of all things from society that in any way, shape, or form say being gay is acceptable.

But back to our so-called agenda: Why does no one seem to notice that it’s mentioned only when someone or some entity is trying to oppress us? Gays and lesbians have far more to do with our lives than go around each day trying to promote some ethnocentric ideology.

Last week my agenda was getting over the loss of my friend of 14 years, Owen Chou Lee, the best damned chow chow to ever put four paws on the ground. It was to try to get more employment in my industry, to keep up with property taxes, to get a manager and an agent so I can move forward. It was about loving my remaining pets and trying to explain to them where Owen was; and hugging my friends and extended family, who came to my side during yet another loss.

It was about deciding whether to go to the doctor for this damned flu I’ve caught so I could have my voice back in time for my radio show. It was about life, my life. Converting school kids into homos or indoctrinating unsuspecting and susceptible young nubile adolescents just didn’t fit into my schedule at all.

But when pressed on-air, I managed to come up with a set of goals I’d like to see gays and lesbians achieve. Federal domestic partnerships with all the benefits of marriage would be nice. (Please, don’t give me the separate-is-not-equal argument about marriage.) Protection from getting fired would be good. For that matter, so would not having to worry about getting kicked out of the house. Allowing gay youths a safe haven at school through the teaching of diversity would be fun. Creating an environment where all gays and lesbians young or old could live openly, without the fear of political, social, or physical repercussions, would be a nice start

Basically, we want the same benefits, rights, and protections as other Americans.

So there is in fact a gay agenda--however, it’s called by the wrong name. The agenda isn’t gay, it’s American. What all those opposing us don’t understand is that we have the same agenda that everyone in this nation has: to be free while living here. Free to be who and what we are; to have our unions sanctioned with the same benefits; to not fear death or expect to be an outcast at home, work, and school for simply being different.

Gays and lesbians want freedom, particularly from religious oppression. We want what our founding fathers wanted--a place where all are indeed created equal, endowed with the same inalienable rights, and treated as such.

There is no gay agenda--this is so clear, and it’s the stance we must take. But there is an American agenda, a promise made by the founders that we are still striving to fulfill. Gays and lesbians have merely started to pursue the freedoms and exercise the rights granted in that document that the president wants to amend. How we get and pursue those rights and freedoms remains up for debate, and while there is not real unity in the gay community, there is one thing that ties us in the United States together: We are Americans first. It’s time to remind the Right that our agenda is not based on sexual orientation but on a political and social promise, set forth by a group of insightful men a couple hundred years ago.

Our American agenda doesn’t need a sexuality. It has a foundation, the very one on which this country was established. I stand not on the fact that I sleep with other men, but on the fact that our founders recognized we were a nation of misfits, all of us outcasts, who suddenly had to get along within our nation’s borders. They gave us a road map for that--us, we the people. Gays and lesbians are part of that we, whether anyone likes it or not.

So the next time someone asks what the gay agenda is, tell them you’ll forward it to them immediately, then promptly send them a copy of the Constitution. It’s ours as well as theirs; moreover, it was set up more for us than for them. After all, it was meant to give a voice to those who might not otherwise have one. To call out a religious monarchy (or a theocratic administration thinly disguised as Republican). To give a voice to those who previously went unheard. This voice belongs to us, gays and lesbians, because it is our document too.

We don’t need 22 gay organizations to sit down and come up with talking points labeled an “agenda”; instead, we should remember that the Continental Congress has already done so for us. Not one thing we are fighting for has to do with our sexuality. NOT ONE THING. Every single thing we want is promised to everyone else in this great melting pot. It all can be summed up nicely by the very pledge schoolchildren make each and every day: liberty and justice for all.

What part of all do those on the other side not understand? An antigay agenda is un-American, and when we start making that argument, we’ll win more battles than we’ll lose.

Karel is a talk-show host on KGO AM 810 in San Francisco on Saturdays and Sundays from 7 to 10 p.m. He can also be heard on the Web at www.kgo.com. His book of essays, You Can’t Say That, has just been published. Find out more about Karel or order the book at www.karelchannel.com. You can e-mail Karel at comments@karelchannel.com.

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max. HTML formatting and hyperlinks are NOT permitted.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives
  • View From the Hill: The End of DADT?
    Defense Secretary Robert Gates revealed that lawyers are exploring ways to ease enforcement of the military's gay ban, but cautioned that the law doesn't leave much wiggle room. He need look no further than DOD history for a lesson in altering the policy.
  • Hot Sheet: Week of July 5
    When you get back from that big 4th of July barbecue, unwind with Sacha Baron Cohen's Bruno and your favorite B-movie-mocking, basic cable robots.
  • Hungry Like the Wolf
    A master of viola, ukulele, piano, and harp, Patrick Wolf is a music prodigy -- one who, the night before this interview, spit on a cop and got himself arrested.
  • Soapside: Advocate's Guide to Daytime
    Forbes March talks about playing gay, Otalia fans outraged, update on One Life to Live’s Patricia Maurceri’s firing over gay plot point, Phillip Chancellor III big reveal, and Erica Kane goes to Africa.
  • The Faces of Federal Prop. 8
    With the federal challenge to Prop. 8 moving full speed ahead, Advocate.com sits down with the two couples named as plaintiffs in the suit.
  • Mommy, the Gays Are Coming
    After a year of advancements and celebration for gay and lesbian Colombians, the community takes to the streets of Bogota for the country's biggest pride ever.
  • The Pride of Antwerp
    Advocate.com hits the gay-friendly streets of Antwerp with openly gay police commissioner Serge Muyters.
  • Excerpt: Mean Little Deaf Queer
    In an excerpt from her humorous and harrowing new memoir, Mean Little Deaf Queer, Terry Galloway recalls her early childhood, describing feelings of ugliness, confusion about gender, and being one of the boys.
  • Top Political Blogs
    From Joe.My.God to The Daily Beast, Advocate.com spotlights a few of the best blogs that cover politics, inside and way outside the Beltway.
  • The Diva of French Television
    A hot young screenwriter who has made gay OK for millions of French viewers, Nicolas Mercier sips champagne, dons a feathered hat, and says he wants to see Colin Farrell and Jude Law go at it.