Election 2008: The Iowa Caucuses, Dispatch 2  | Politics | Advocate.com

||  Politics  ||
Election 2008: The Iowa Caucuses, Dispatch 2
Jeff Westendorf is president of the Log Cabin Republicans chapter in Iowa and a Giuliani supporter. Westendorf is the second of five LGBT Iowans whom The Advocate will follow through the Iowa caucus on January 3, 2008.
By Kerry Eleveld
An Advocate.com exclusive posted December 27, 2007
Election 2008: The Iowa Caucuses, Dispatch 2

Caucusgoer: Jeff Westendorf

Age: 38

Candidate: Rudy Giuliani

Hometown: Des Moines

First-time Caucuser?: “No. This is my third or fourth, I think.”

Last Candidate Caucused For: John McCain in 2000. Bush had no opposition in 2004.

Why Giuliani?

“I’m supporting Giuliani because number one, he’s a fiscal conservative,” says Westendorf, “and I consider him a social moderate -- to maybe even liberal -- in the Republican Party.” One thing Westendorf admires about a candidate, whether they’re Republican or Democrat, is when they take a stand and stick with it. “Giuliani stands by his convictions as it relates to abortion, as it relates to gay rights issues, regardless of what’s politically popular within the party. I would love to see the Ron Paul stance that gays should marry, but Giuliani’s not there.” Giuliani backs domestic partnerships as a vehicle for giving gays and lesbians legal protections in their relationships. “He’s standing up and he’s saying that even though it’s not politically popular within the party.”

Democratic vs. Republican Caucuses

The Republican caucus in Iowa is more of a straightforward straw poll, as opposed to the Democratic caucus, where people choose a candidate and, if she or he doesn’t get at least 15% of the votes in the room, the caucuser must choose another candidate. At the GOP caucuses, "people will advocate for certain candidates and then, after the discussion, there’s a motion to cease discussion and then you vote,” says Westendorf. Pretty simple, right?

After Midnight...

Here's where it gets interesting. At the end of both Republican and Democratic caucuses, some people leave while others stay to present party platforms, which are discussed and then voted on. A majority vote of whoever is present at that point advances a platform to the county convention where it’s debated and voted on again in similar fashion.

“I think that’s the more critical part of the caucus than the straw poll itself -- the grassroots discussion and plank development ideas,” says Westendorf. Social conservatives such as evangelical Christians are famously committed to staying at Iowa’s GOP caucuses into the wee hours of the morning in order to advance conservative planks to the county, the state, and eventually, the national convention -- or so they hope. That’s why Westendorf plans to make it a late night. “I’ll be there to argue against those types of planks,” he says, “and I’m working on developing my own platform proposal that would be a more inclusive definition of family, a more inclusive definition of civil rights and liberties that doesn’t discriminate against any particular person, including but not limited to homosexuals.”

Westendorf has been researching his platform and talking to the national Log Cabin organization about how to word such a proposal. “My thought is if I can draft one or two that I think can be accepted, I’m going to disseminate those to some other people in the state of Iowa,” he says, hoping that other caucus locations might also be able to pass the platform.

Kerry Eleveld is news editor of The Advocate.

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.