
Caucusgoer: R.J. Droll
Age: 31
Candidate: Joe Biden
Hometown: Des Moines
First-time Caucuser?: Yes.
Candidate in 2004: Gen. Wesley Clark, but he didn’t run in the ’04 caucus.
Why Biden?
“I’m not a single-issue voter,” says Droll, “and he’s very astute about the issues going on in the Middle East. He actually had a plan for getting out of Iraq long before it was en vogue to have a plan.”
Droll also likes the fact the Biden coauthored the Federal Violent Crimes Control and Law Enforcement and the Violence Against Women Act. “That lets me know that he’s going to be looking out for people who aren’t just white heterosexual males,” he says. “He also has 24 years of experience.”
“He may be polling in the single digits, but you never know. The night before the caucus in 2004, we were all saying, ‘John Kerry who?’ So you really don’t know.”
Second Choice? (In the Iowa Democratic caucus, if your candidate does not win the support of at least 15% of the people at your caucus site, he or she is not considered “viable,” and you must choose another candidate.)
Droll is in the unusual position of backing Gov. Bill Richardson as a second choice, who also might be not viable. In that case, he would be back to Sen. Hillary Clinton, which is exactly where he was at the beginning.
“This is where I met and decided to support Senator Biden,” says Droll, referring to the Ritual Café, the lesbian-owned and operated gathering spot in downtown Des Moines where we were seated. “We sat here for 45 minutes to an hour -- no press, no pressure. Up until then, I started as a Hillary supporter.”
Gay Marriage
Biden doesn’t support same-sex marriage, but Droll liked the honesty with which he approached the subject during that hour-long conversation. “When he explained his opinion on gay marriage, he was coming at it from his heart -- not from necessarily what we wanted to hear,” Droll says. “He said the nation just isn’t ready for marriage in 2008. He supports equal rights for everyone -- he thinks everyone should have the same rights. If he’s willing to support that, that would set us on the right path.”
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.