
At 6:45 a.m. Tuesday, Cynthia Wade received the call she was hoping for: Her film Freeheld was nominated for an Academy Award in the short documentary field. Freeheld tells the wrenching story of policewoman Laurel Hester’s battle to bequeath her 25-year pension to her partner of six years, auto mechanic Stacie Andree, before Laurel died of lung cancer. The governing “Freeholders” of the conservative stronghold of Ocean County, N.J., did not want to grant that right to same-sex partners, even though they had the legal authority to do so.
The Advocate spoke to filmmaker Wade on the afternoon of her big day: She called from snowy Park City, Utah, where she was attending the Sundance Film Festival (the event where, a year before, Freeheld won a Special Jury Prize).
Cynthia Wade shooting Freeholders meetings
How does it feel to win an Oscar nomination?
It’s been an amazing day. I’m
thrilled. We all thought we had a good, healthy shot,
but you never know these things.
The genesis of Freeheld was that you and a
small crew just showed up at a meeting of the
Freeholders where they were discussing Laurel’s case.
I had two cameras, two assistants, and release
forms. I didn’t know that they’d let me
shoot. And within 15 minutes I knew this was my next film
and I’d throw everything aside professionally in my
life to do this.
And they just let you shoot?
There was a hush and tension in the room and I
thought, All right, let me start shooting unless someone
tells me to stop. It turns out that in New
Jersey you can film anything at a public meeting.
That’s the law. And I didn’t need release
forms from the Freeholders. Afterward, I went up to
Laurel and Stacie and introduced myself and asked if I
could tell their story. And Laurel said yes. She had
always wanted to write a book, and realized she was running
out of time.
You spent a lot of time with Laurel and Stacie
during the last 10 weeks of Laurel’s life, often
staying over at their house.
It was just me and Laurel in the house during
the day in early December [2005], looking at old
photos and newspaper articles about her life as a
detective. She actually seemed in a better mood and less
depressed doing that. Stacie was at the auto shop all
day, and there was definitely a wariness from her in
the beginning -- Who is this filmmaker, and why has
Laurel let her come into our lives? But as
Laurel got sicker, Stacie began to lean on me more and liked
me coming down [Webb lives in Brooklyn, N.Y.].
That’s when I crossed the line into being a
friend. There’s a tradition in documentary film that
you should be this fly on the wall, but there was so
much at stake with them that I didn’t feel I
could do that.
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.