Target State: Colorado
Electoral College Votes: 9
Voted for Bush: 2000 & 2004
Governor: Bill Ritter, Jr. (D)
State Senate: 20 Dem, 15 GOP
State House: 39 Dem, 26 GOP
Races to watch: Jared Polis, openly gay candidate who is expected to win Colorado’s 2nd Congressional District; Rep. Marilyn Musgrave, Federal Marriage Amendment author, who is in a tight race to keep her congressional seat.
***
Although Colorado twice voted for George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004, the state has been trending Democratic at a local level for the past two elections. Going into the 2004 election, the GOP controlled both state legislative chambers, 18-17 in the Senate and 37-28 in the House. Coming out, Republicans lost control of both bodies, with the Dems taking a 1-seat advantage in the Senate and gaining a 35-30 edge in the House. In the 2006 elections, Coloradans voted to give Democrats a commanding lead in both chambers -- 20-15 in the senate, and 39-26 in the house -- and they elected Democrat Bill Ritter governor.
John Straayer, political science professor at Colorado State University, says the shift is partly due to the political headwind created by an unpopular GOP president, but also the Republican Party’s emphasis on conservative social values at the expense of bread-and-butter issues like the economy, education, health care, and infrastructure.
“When the recession hit in 2001/2002, the state was in extraordinary dire straights and there were cuts in higher ed., highways, health care and so forth,” Straayer explains. “There was a sense that the dominant party, the Republican Party, which had drifted further and further to the social issues of the Evangelical right, was pre-occupied with those issues, and was not attending to the meat and potato stuff. I think the failure of the Republicans explains the Dem’s success more than anything.”
One Colorado Republican who rode the Christian right’s social agenda to prominence is Congresswoman Marilyn Musgrave -- author of the Federal Marriage Amendment -- whom gay activists have already spent millions of dollars trying to unseat in both 2004 and 2006.
“In fact, of the seven US House seats, the only one that is a real race is in the 4th Congressional with [Betsy] Markey and the incumbent, Musgrave,” Straayer says.
Musgrave served in the state legislature during most of the '90s and was elected to the US House of Representatives in 2002 by a margin of 55% to 42%. But her re-election races have grown ever tighter, with Musgrave narrowly defeating the Democratic candidate in 2006, 46% to 43% (a third-party candidate won 11% of the vote).
Straayer says Rep. Musgrave essentially defined herself as a candidate of the Evangelical right, which has slowly but surely become less of a selling point over the years.
“She’s got a hardcore base, but that base does not get her to 50% and she seems to have stalled out on that,” he says. “She’s been trying to talk about other things. I think she’s understood that as she’s defined herself, there’s been more and more discomfort with her narrow agenda. Some people just flat don’t like it. And some of the others who may agree on some of those issues have a sense that she’s not broad enough to worry about other problems.”
Musgrave’s Democratic challenger Betsy Markey has opened up a lead of several points in recent polls in what should be a safe Republican district.
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.