* This is the fourth article in The Advocate's continuing coverage of four battleground states: Colorado, Florida, Virginia, and Ohio. Click here to read the previous installments.
In one of my earliest political memories, I'm marching around my grandparents' house with my homemade "Clinton for President" sign while watching the 1992 Democratic National Convention on television. As staunch Republicans, my grandparents were certainly baffled by their grandson, who knew little about politics at the time but who clearly was leaning toward the opposite end of their position on the political spectrum.
Never in my wildest dreams did I expect to be so actively involved in the planning of the 2008 Democratic National Convention in Denver. In fact, over a year ago I sat in a stuffy Capitol Hill cafeteria weighing the pros and cons of working for congresswoman Diana DeGette as her deputy chief of staff and communications director. She represented Denver and would become the congressional host of the 2008 convention. And that was the clincher -- by signing on with Ms. DeGette, I would have the opportunity to work on the convention. Being gay played no role in my decision, but I would soon find out that being gay presented me with a one-of-a-kind opportunity representing her on the Executive Host Committee.
We all know a lot about the 2008 Democratic National Convention in Denver. We know it was truly successful on every level, particularly for the LGBT community, whose presence this year far exceeded that of previous conventions. We saw LGBT delegates represented at almost every event; we saw a sea of rainbow flags; we saw Michelle Obama attend the official LGBT luncheon; and we saw scores of delegates and supporters attend the Human Rights Campaign's Rock to Win concert. The LGBT community was not only included, but visible to a degree never seen before.
What you may not know is that, for months leading up to that historic week in late August in which Barack Obama became the Democratic nominee, rank-and-file members of the LGBT community were hard at work planning a diverse and inclusive convention -- not just for their own community, but for the Democratic community at large. Those working on this year's convention included members of the African-American, Latino, and Asian communities, and gays and lesbians were also represented at the highest levels of convention planning in Denver. My personal story is no different -- it's peppered with so many eye-opening experiences that have now made me a stronger professional because of my unique vantage point working on the convention.
Immediately after moving to Denver, I was thrown into the center of the preparations for the thousands to descend on the city. It was all hands on deck -- whether it was designing the logistics for delegates to maneuver around the city, making our fund-raising targets, or talking up convention planning with local and national reporters, I was ready and willing to make this convention a success like everyone else.
As I represented Representative DeGette around that big oval table in the center of the mayor's office for our weekly Executive Committee meetings, I not only felt welcomed to express my perspective but was expected to speak up. Whether it was discussing event preparations with the mayor of Denver or financial goals with Colorado's soon-to-be senior senator or ticket distribution with the Obama campaign, regardless of who I was, those planning the Denver convention gave me a seat -- a front seat -- at the table.
It was, however, also important to me that LGBT Americans unable to come to Denver felt empowered by this convention. Working with the Human Rights Campaign, I made certain there was an LGBT media liaison working alongside convention media operations so that those across America could feel like they were on top of the news that affected our community. All in our community, whether in Denver or Seattle or Jacksonville, had a stake in what began in Denver.
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.