
Oh, those wacky, closeted, deviant politicians. Actor Steven Weber one-ups even Larry Craig and J. Edgar Hoover (at least the version depicted in Oliver Stone’s JFK) as a sinister-and-sleazy-beneath-the-surface politician in writer-director Luke Eberl’s drama Choose Connor. Weber plays Lawrence Connor, a charismatic congressman who drafts a 15-year-old high achiever, Owen (Alex Linz), as his “youth campaign spokesman.” As Owen becomes more entrenched within Connor’s inner circle, he learns that Connor’s attractive twink of a nephew, Caleb (Escher Holloway), is being used in sordid, sexual ways.
The New York-born Weber -- who famously played the neurotic gay title character in 1995’s Jeffrey and lists TV’s Wings and Brothers & Sisters (his character returns this season) among his credits -- is pretty obsessed with politics himself, and regularly rails against the GOP with zingy panache on his Huffington Post blog. Sarah Palin is a frequent target of his ire of late: “Dan Quayle looks like Alistair Cooke compared to this most current excuse for a Republican construct,” he wrote October 3.
We had a chat with Weber about Choose Connor, closeted Republicans, “Miss Half-Baked Alaska,” and what Jeffrey might be up to today.
Advocate.com:
How did you get involved with Choose Connor and
its 22-year-old director, Luke Eberl?
Steven Weber: They came to me. I was
dumbfounded at how young he was, and even more than that,
how young he looked. But then I was quite struck by
how much we had in common, how much we both love film
and how serious, complex, and earnest he was to tell
this story.
Connor pimps out his own nephew to
“supporters” -- there’s an
Eyes Wide Shut-esque scene during which
Owen catches a bunch of men having their way with Caleb
in a room -- and one can surmise there is a sexual
relationship to boot. Is there actual love between
Connor and Caleb, or is he just using him?
I feel like it’s the latter. I
don’t know if Connor’s really capable of
an emotional attachment to anything except himself and his
ambition. I don’t even know how much Connor
indulges in that [sexual] behavior himself. I
don’t know if he can. We never really see him in the
movie doing anything [sexual with Caleb], which is
good. It leaves so much to your imagination, which
makes it more insidious to me.”
That said, would Escher make a pretty good boy to
send out and “drum up support”?
I think that if you were just to look at him as
just a brand. he’s quite good. Appealing to an
important demographic I would want to reach out to.
Which real-life closeted Republican would you most
liken Connor to?
The obvious one would be a guy like Larry Craig,
but more than anything else Connor is, rather than a
sexual predator, an utter opportunist and has little
else to recommend him aside from that. He has a good deal of
intellectual capability, but he’s corrupted; his soul
is gone. He’s not as bad and ridiculous as Tom
DeLay. He’s a little more subtle in his
criminality.
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.