Wednesday morning, I awoke red with anger and blue with sadness even as tears of joy had graced my face for progress the night before.
This week, voters across the nation affirmed a promise that was launched from Middle America. Barack Obama, half black, half white, raised by grandparents who hailed from the heartland, became the president-elect of a country beleaguered by partisan, socioeconomic, and racial divisions that have haunted our nation for decades and escalated to a crescendo in the last eight years.
“If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible,” President-elect Obama told a rapt crowd in Chicago’s Grant Park, “who still wonders if the dream of our founders is alive in our time, who still questions the power of our democracy, tonight is your answer.”
Yet even as one prejudice fell to the will of the people on Election Day, LGBT Americans awoke the next morning to reports from the West to the South that all but confirmed one thing: We are most certainly second-class citizens in our own country. Even the voters of California -- a state that legislatively approved same-sex marriage rights twice and judicially issued the single most gay-affirming court ruling to date -- appear to have concluded that gay and lesbian partners don’t deserve the equal right to commit their love to each other. While I do not agree with the notion that I am undeserving of the same rights provided to other citizens by the Constitution, I cannot escape the reality that a majority of my fellow citizens still feel exactly that way. So perhaps it is time to reevaluate our movement’s approach with an eye to the area of our country that just supplied us with the single biggest civil rights advancement in a century.
Midwesterners are a practical people. They don’t have that feel-good “it’s all about the journey” vibe of West Coasters, nor do they possess the soothing subtleties of Southerners, and they’re a tad shy of the bottom-line brashness of Northeasterners. Function is more important than form to a Midwesterner, but they value the ethos of hard work, decency, and fairness above all else.
So when out Illinois state representative Greg Harris introduced a marriage bill in February 2007 and then realized he didn’t have the votes to pass it, he didn’t rest on his laurels. Instead, he turned around and introduced a civil unions bill that same month. Why? “We knew it was going to take a few years to pass marriage, and real people need real protections today,” says Rick Garcia of Equality Illinois. They also wanted to capitalize immediately on the commitments of state legislators who had rejected marriage but privately pledged their support for a lesser union.
Not surprisingly, our new president’s approach to LGBT concerns largely mirrors the Illinois gay community’s practical handling of them. When I interviewed Senator Obama in April 2008 and pushed him on his lack of support for full marriage protections, he indicated that his position was informed by what he thought was strategically possible at this moment in time.
“I’m the product of a mixed marriage that would have been illegal in 12 states when I was born,” he said. “That doesn’t mean that had I been an adviser to Dr. King back then, I would have told him to lead with repealing an anti-miscegenation law, because it just might not have been the best strategy in terms of moving broader equality forward.”
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.
Home | Contact | Current Issue | LGBT Community Partners | Staff
Jobs | Help
Subscribe: Print Edition Digital Edition | Subscriber Services: Print Edition Digital Edition
Visit our Websites
Out.com | OutTraveler.com | HIVPlusMag.com | Alyson.com | HereTV.com | GayWired.com | SheWired.com
Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Community Guidelines | Legal Notice
Advocate.com © 2009 Regent Entertainment Media Inc. All Rights Reserved.
