CONTACTStaffCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2024 Pride Publishing Inc.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use.
Urging a major shift in U.S. policy, some health experts are recommending that virtually all Americans be tested routinely for HIV, much as they are for cancer and other diseases. Since the early years of the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s, the government has recommended routine screening only in big cities, where AIDS rates are high, and among members of high-risk groups, such as gay men and drug addicts. But two large federally funded studies found that the cost of routinely testing and treating nearly all adults would be outweighed by the benefits: a reduction in new infections and the opportunity to start patients on drug cocktails early, when they work best. "Given the availability of effective therapy and preventive measures, it is possible to improve care and perhaps influence the course of the epidemic through widespread, effective, and cost-effective screening," Samuel A. Bozzette, MD, wrote in an editorial accompanying the studies, which appear in Thursday's edition of the New England Journal of Medicine. A failure to institute such screening at doctors' offices and clinics would be "a critical disservice" to HIV-positive people and "the future health of the nation," wrote Bozzette, who is from the University of California, San Diego, and the Rand Corporation think tank in Santa Monica, Calif. Robert Janssen, director of HIV/AIDS prevention at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said the CDC will reevaluate its guidelines over the next two years and will consider the study's findings as well as the availability of new, rapid HIV antibody tests that produce results in 20 minutes instead of the usual week or two. Who would bear the cost of expanded testing--and the cost of the treatment, which runs to at least $15,000 a year--remains a sticky question amid government cutbacks in health care funding. However, Janssen said the studies' findings could lead some private insurers to encourage more HIV antibody testing. One of the studies, by researchers at Duke and Stanford universities and the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, estimates that routine one-time testing of everyone would cut new infections each year by just over 20% and that every HIV-positive patient identified would gain an average of 1 1/2 years of life. The other study, by Yale and Harvard researchers, found that testing people every three to five years would be cost-effective for all but the lowest-risk people, such as those who are celibate or are in monogamous heterosexual relationships. And even for those people, one-time testing was found to be cost-effective. Nationwide, about 40,000 new HIV infections occur each year. An estimated 950,000 Americans are infected with the virus, but about 280,000 of them don't know it. Current CDC guidelines recommend routine tests wherever the prevalence of HIV infection is more than 1%--basically, cities and some densely populated suburbs. "If you need proof of the fact that it's not working, look at all the people who have slipped through the cracks--280,000," said A. David Paltiel of the Yale School of Medicine's division of health policy, lead author of the second study. The VA-funded study found that in areas where about 1 in 100 patients has undiagnosed HIV--what the CDC calls high-risk settings--widespread testing would cost about $15,100 for each year of good health gained by people diagnosed with the virus, counting the benefits to their sexual partners. Even in areas with an undiagnosed HIV infection rate of only 1 in 2,000--the rate in the general population--each healthy year gained by newly diagnosed HIV patients and their partners would still cost less than $50,000. That is the threshold at which health economists generally consider treatments to be cost-effective. (AP)
Want more breaking equality news & trending entertainment stories?
Check out our NEW 24/7 streaming service: the Advocate Channel!
Download the Advocate Channel App for your mobile phone and your favorite streaming device!
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Here Are Our 2024 Election Predictions. Will They Come True?
November 07 2023 1:46 PM
Meet all 37 of the queer women in this season's WNBA
April 17 2024 11:24 AM
17 Celebs Who Are Out & Proud of Their Trans & Nonbinary Kids
November 30 2023 10:41 AM
Here Are the 15 Most LGBTQ-Friendly Cities in the U.S.
November 01 2023 5:09 PM
Which State Is the Queerest? These Are the States With the Most LGBTQ+ People
December 11 2023 10:00 AM
These 27 Senate Hearing Room Gay Sex Jokes Are Truly Exquisite
December 17 2023 3:33 PM
10 Cheeky and Homoerotic Photos From Bob Mizer's Nude Films
November 18 2023 10:05 PM
42 Flaming Hot Photos From 2024's Australian Firefighters Calendar
November 10 2023 6:08 PM
These Are the 5 States With the Smallest Percentage of LGBTQ+ People
December 13 2023 9:15 AM
Here are the 15 gayest travel destinations in the world: report
March 26 2024 9:23 AM
Watch Now: Advocate Channel
Trending Stories & News
For more news and videos on advocatechannel.com, click here.
Trending Stories & News
For more news and videos on advocatechannel.com, click here.
Latest Stories
Trans man Tee Arnold shot to death in Florida
April 17 2024 4:41 PM
Can scientific research on the causes of homosexuality be used against LGBTQ+ people?
April 17 2024 4:02 PM
George Takei releases kids' book about his childhood in internment camp
April 17 2024 3:18 PM
PLUS
ExclusivesTodrick Hall on surviving the rumors and remembering where he came from
April 17 2024 2:33 PM
Pride
Yahoo FeedHow The Pride Store celebrates National Tea Day: A tale of two brews
April 17 2024 2:14 PM
'Parents' Rights' movements forget families have the right to read LGBTQ+ books
April 17 2024 10:15 AM
This gay man had to flee Ghana after a violent attack. He’s finally been granted asylum
April 17 2024 9:17 AM