Issue Number 938 | Richard Goldstein: The disappearing queer | Advocate.com The disappearing queer  | News | Advocate.com

Advocate.com health Channel
||  Left Hook  ||
 
The disappearing queer
From The Advocate  May 10, 2005

SpongeBob SquarePants is not the only victim of right-wing hysteria over queer content on TV. And children are not the only ones these moralistas are determined to protect. Conservative groups and their federal allies are scaring the networks away from anything that might be deemed indecent at Bible camp. Things that were permissible in prime time a year or two ago are now verboten. I’m not just talking about glimpses of female flesh. The big chill is taking a toll on our very visibility.

Back in 2000 there were 16 comedy series with regular or recurring gay or lesbian characters. Now there are only eight, according to the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation. We’re faring better in dramas, thanks to crime shows. The new series Eyes breaks the mold just by having a black gay detective, but usually in this genre we’re the victim or the perp. We can be secretaries at the precinct house, but not cops. We do get to strut our stuff in reality shows, but everyone knows queers can think fast and swallow living things. And don’t tell me it’s progressive to show gay decorators or body groomers. Even fundamentalists are willing to trust sodomites with their hair.

The exception to this pattern is cable, where we still appear as fully drawn human beings. But these shows reach only a fraction of the audience that watches the broadcast networks. In the TV mainstream we’re less likely to be shown leading ordinary lives than we were a few years ago (and viewers of American Idol have reason to believe the closet is back). In short, we’re being quietly shoved to the fringes of entertainment—and not just on television.

A flood of queer-themed indie movies is heading our way. But these films will open small in just a few cities and then go to video. When it comes to big-budget films, the studios seem to be growing skittish. Last year 12 features had significant or supporting queer characters. This year, so far, there’s only Brokeback Mountain, Ang Lee’s tale of queer cowboys. It remains to be seen how candid this film will be—or whether it will earn enough to impress studio heads. That won’t be easy if the movie can’t play in states where the religious reign supreme. Some theaters in those places won’t show IMAX documentaries that mention evolution; imagine how they’ll react to homos on the range.

Page: 1 | 2

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.