Issue Number 961 | Rhyhm and muse | Advocate.com Rhythm and muse  | Commentary | Advocate.com

Advocate.com health Channel
||  Cover story  ||
 
Rhythm and muse
Tom and Mike of hot dance duo Dangerous Muse talk about loving the ’80s, being “supersexual,” and the power of eyeliner
Excerpted from The Advocate  April 25, 2006

On a cool Saturday afternoon in a nondescript Hollywood photo studio, the members of Dangerous Muse—the new and impossibly pretty electronic dance-pop duo of Mike Furey and Tom Napack—prepare to shoot their first music video. It’s for their hit single “The Rejection,” which in November 2005 debuted at number 2 on the iTunes dance charts with practically zero promotion. As a skeleton crew preps the small, all-white set—an homage to cheap and simple early-’80s videos—vocalist and lyricist Mike, 23, consults with director Mike Korbic over the video’s female dancers’ outfits. Keyboardist and programmer Tom, 21, chills off to the side to a mix CD of dance music (Soft Cell, New Order) playing in the background, at one point quietly mimicking the chords to Madonna’s newest single, “Sorry,” on his trusty “keytar.”

Finally, the set in place, the proto–Robert Palmer black lace and stiletto outfits OK’d, Mike—sporting the requisite skintight low-rise jeans and loose-fitting black top—gets into place, the dancers strategically placed around him, waiting for the director’s cue. Korbic calls action, then for playback. The song’s

Depeche Mode–esque synth chirps pump through the speakers, and the women swarm Mike, clawing at his clothes and pulling him to the floor as he struggles to sing to the camera lyrics like “I’d like to like you like you like me / But I can’t, please understand.”

The meaning seems clear—a sexy gay boy trying his best to fend off rabid female suitors. “It can definitely be read that way, for sure,” Mike says with a smile the next day by the rooftop pool of a West Hollywood hotel. But he continues, “I would like to leave it up to the individual listening to the song. I wouldn’t want to limited it to any specific interpretation.”

Mike’s not being cagey. He and Tom are the product of a growing pansexual New York City nightlife they discovered while students at Fordham University in the Bronx, so much so that when asked they both avoid placing a definitive flag anywhere on the Kinsey scale of sexuality.

Vary also writes for Entertainment Weekly and Variety.

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.