Issue Number 969 | Is lying about HIV a crime? | Advocate.com Is lying about HIV a crime?  | Commentary | Advocate.com

Advocate.com health Channel
 
Is lying about HIV a crime?
From The Advocate  August 29, 2006
Is lying about HIV a crime?

Australian Michael Neal is a gay man’s worst nightmare. He’s a sexually promiscuous liar who told partners he was HIV-negative when he knew he wasn’t. In some tragic instances, Neal even persuaded his partners to have unprotected sex with him. Now some of those men are HIV-positive.

Melbourne police have charged Neal with endangering public safety, but we believe going through with this prosecution would set a perilous precedent. Of course it’s wrong to fabricate a story about your HIV status, much less to knowingly expose people to the virus. But it’s also wrong to criminalize people for doing either.

There is a criminal case to be made if it can be proved a person intended to harm a sex partner by infecting them with HIV. Laws against attempted murder already exist. But prosecuting lying is not only impractical but dangerous. If we begin jailing lotharios for simply misrepresenting their HIV status, do we draw the line at cancer-causing HPV, syphilis—the flu? If a straight woman lies about being on birth control and ends up pregnant, is she a crook? There’s no bottom to this slippery slope.

Protecting yourself from HIV is a matter of personal responsibility. It’s a matter that should be outside the jurisdiction of the criminal courts—except, of course, in matters of rape or assault. In cases of consensual sex, if we rely on words (which often turn out to be untrue) rather than facts (condoms protect you from HIV), we’re complicit in what happens to our bodies. Not to mention that what goes on between two consenting adults should not be fodder for government control. As LGBT Americans we know this better than anyone—and we also know the government doesn’t always act in our best interests.

Lying just to get laid is evil, but if you have any concern about HIV infection and you haven’t seen your partner’s antibody test results with your own eyes, it is your responsibility to protect yourself. We risk our lives when we sleep with someone. That’s the sad truth. At that moment of decision when we weigh risk and pleasure, we have a choice to defend our lives or not. That choice—coupled with the knowledge we’ve been given over the past 25 years—gives us power. Relying on the government to protect you by criminalizing bad boyfriends is a surrender of that power. And we will never be an advocate for that.

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.