
When did you first make the connection that Louis
Rove was Karl Rove’s father?
Quite recently, just a couple of weeks ago, when
I got an e-mail from a woman at Boingboing[.net]. That
was the first I’d heard about it.
Considering the obvious disparity there, did it
come as a shock?
Well, I don’t know if shock is the right
word; surprise, perhaps. I gather from what
I’ve read that there was a great deal of affection
between them, but that fruit fell a long way from the tree.
Did Louie ever mention a son who was perhaps a
black sheep or bad seed?
I really only knew a small bit about his family.
I knew he was divorced and had adult children and that
was pretty much it.
How do you think Karl feels about this new
attention placed on his adoptive father?
I wonder if he really cares. From what little I
know about the man, which is only from what I read, my
feeling is that his concerns would be for himself and
not for his father.
You’ve stated that Louie had at least 37
piercings, most of which were in his penis. For that
many piercings to fit, he must’ve been
rather well-endowed.
Well, it was slightly above normal. There are actually
photos on Boingboing.
Honestly, I couldn’t quite bring myself to
click on the links.
[Laughs] A man I was associated with named Fakir
Musafar, who was a photographer, took pictures of
Louie for our Gauntlet publication, Piercing Fans
International Quarterly. Louie was featured in issue No. 17
in 1983 and a number of those are on the Boing Boing site.
I’ve heard of a Prince Albert, but the idea of
over 30 in one penis boggles my mind. Where did they all go?
He had what we called a “ladder”—a
series of piercings, one pretty much next to other,
through which there were small studs with little balls
on each end. There were four of these ladders: one on the
top, one on the bottom and one on each side.
I understand that piercing can increase
sensitivity, but doesn’t that much bling begin to
get in the way in the bedroom?
Well, I don’t know what kind of activity
he was into. [Laughs] A certain amount of it
might’ve been self-pleasuring, and if you’re
involved with someone who has a similar fetish, I’m
sure you can find ways of entertaining one another.
Do you have penile piercings?
Yes, but not that many by a long shot!
As one grows older, do you downsize? Because I
imagine that piercings tend to encourage sagging. Is
that the case?
[Laughs] Not that I can tell. We would sag
regardless. I still have the ones that are important
to me.
Nipples and noses are one thing, but piercing
someone’s penis must’ve been another thing
altogether. Were you nervous handling such
delicate merchandise?
Well, that nervousness was only during the early
stages of my career when I was learning how to pierce.
Once you develop a skill, it becomes pretty much
routine. It’s like learning how to cook—you
don’t get nervous every time you go into the
kitchen. If you’ve got the skill, you do what you
do. I had a good mentor named Doug Malloy who I met in the
early years when I moved to Los Angeles. Doug had
developed over his lifetime a set of—well, they
were still pretty crude, but—a set of workable
piercing techniques. I was able, as I became more
familiar with what I was trying to accomplish, to
modify those techniques and the equipment to make the
piercing process much easier.
Have you since packed away your piercing tools?
Although I've pretty much retired from piercing,
I do maybe one or two a year. I get asked by friends
and friends of friends if I will do something for
them. Fortunately, an old Gauntlet employee has his own
shop now in the Castro, and he lets me pierce there on those
rare occasions.
The fetish crowd has a reputation for being quite
tough, but did you encounter a lot of squeamish queens?
In the hands of a skilled piercer, piercings are not
much more than an injection by a doctor. It’s a
quick “ouch” and it’s over.
Did Louie take it like a man?
Yes, Louie was a great person to pierce. He had no
problem with it and frequently did a number of
piercings in one sitting.
You obviously got to know him quite intimately. Was
there any romantic connection?
No, it was just as friends and associates.
I understand you’re planning on writing a book
about your part in the history of body modification. In
light of this recent discovery, will Louie get a
special chapter?
I don’t know whether or not he’ll
get his own chapter, but he’ll certainly be
mentioned!
How has the pierced community changed since your heyday?
When I started my business back in 1975, my
focus for body piercing was as a means of erotic
enhancement. Today, it’s largely shifted to being
more about decoration or making some kind of statement of
independence or identity.
So did you ever imagine when you were piercing
Louie that decades later you’d be speaking to
The Advocate about his “little Louie?”
It’s definitely surreal. I had no idea.
But that was then and this is now.
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.