Issue Number 1002 | Five Films You Didn't Know Were Gay | Advocate.com Five Films You Didn't Know Were Gay  |  | Advocate.com

Advocate.com health Channel
||  Entertainment  ||
 
Five Films You Didn't Know Were Gay
I’m not the kind of person to go looking for homo subtext when it’s not there. And really, you shouldn’t be either. Queer moviegoers aren’t obliged to see everything filtered through a subtext-decoding spyglass. But I saw nearly 400 movies in 2007 (yes, really), all in the line of duty. And I can tell you that at least a handful of the movies released this year were really gay films trying to pass for straight. And I have evidence…
From The Advocate  February 26, 2008
Five Films You Didn't Know Were Gay

Hairspray
Stated plot: Some kids dance their way to racial equality in 1960s Baltimore.

Really about: The inexorable march of progress toward human equality. Not taking into account its weirdo star in drag (see Wild Hogs below) or tabloid rumors about Queen Latifah, what is this movie—conceived and executed by queers—but a metaphor for gay liberation?

The proof: The final number, when not referencing the NAACP, isn’t about race so much as it is the “paradise we’ve been dreaming of” and nothing being able to slow down the “rhythm of two hearts in love.”

The Assassination of Jesse James by The Coward Robert Ford
Stated plot: Professional hanger-on Robert Ford both idolizes and despises his boss and best frenemy James. Then he shoots him dead.

Really about: Unrequited love turned ugly in an era when only Walt Whitman had the self-awareness to know he wanted more than companionship from his “buddies.”

The proof: Much like the Lucille Ball–obsessed gay child in Todd Haynes’s short film Dottie Gets Spanked, Casey Affleck’s Robert Ford collects bits of media related to Jesse James and reads every nickel novel he can find. Scrapbooking like that is kind of a giveaway.

300
Stated plot: Manly Spartans trounce eyeliner-wearing Persians.

Really about: Insanely horny guys on the rampage, all of them constructing intricate decoy plans that will allow them to touch other men.

The proof: Try as they might, they can’t shake that “army of lovers” thing. It doesn’t help when every guy in the movie is half-naked and has digitized abs like an issue of Physique Pictorial come to life. Also? Totally homophobic. And that’s really all the proof you need.

Page: 1 | 2
Photo courtesy of New Line Cinema

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.