Issue Number 1023 | When a Nod's Not Enough | Advocate.com When a Nod’s Not Enough  | Politics | Advocate.com

Continental promo
|| Home > Politics  ||
 

When a Nod’s Not Enough

Updated: 2/19/2009 7:44:56 PM Now’s the time for Barack Obama to start delivering on his promise of change. But will your most important issues be among his top priorities?
A shorter version of this story appeared in The Advocate  February 2009
When a Nod’s Not Enough

On the evening of October 10, then–Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama attended a fund-raiser in Philadelphia for major gay donors at the city’s Sheraton Hotel. According to the event’s organizer, Equality Forum executive director Malcolm Lazin, the benefit was the only top-level LGBT donor event Obama attended during the general election campaign. Fittingly, Obama used that exclusive opportunity to make a dramatic announcement that, if not technically a promise, was nonetheless heartening as far as political pledges go.

“He anticipated that very early on both hate crimes and [the Employment Non-Discrimination Act] would pass,” Lazin says. “Then he went further and said that he expected during his term[s], four or eight years, that ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ and [the Defense of Marriage Act] would be repealed.” At no other time in the campaign did Obama speak with such specificity about gay issues, nor has he or anyone in his administration made such detailed comments about his legislative agenda with respect to those issues since he won the presidency. But if Obama does indeed undertake the steps needed to accomplish the goals that Lazin says he outlined -- and, more important, if he is successful in doing so -- it would solidify his position in the pantheon of gay rights heroes.

Barack Obama was arguably the most pro-gay major-party presidential campaigner in American history. From his first national political address (the barnstorming keynote he delivered at the 2004 Democratic National Convention) up to his acceptance speech in Chicago’s Grant Park, he repeatedly spoke of the struggles gay people face, explicitly linking them to the greater civil rights movements that have illuminated American history. So it’s understandable that his election has left gay men and women feeling a bit giddy. And the fact that all this inclusive language is coming from a man who, as of January 20, will become the country’s first black president makes the rhetoric all the more meaningful.

While everyone has discussed the transformative nature of a black president, few have pondered its possible effects on the gay populace -- how a black president may move the country toward greater acceptance of other minorities, including gay people. “His general philosophy is to push past identity politics to a truly inclusive vision,” says Evan Wolfson, founder and executive director of the New York City–based group Freedom to Marry. “That’s the way he looks at the world, and I think gay people belong comfortably in that picture.” As Wolfson attests, even when Obama isn’t addressing gay issues explicitly, many gay people intuit a subtle embrace in his soaring rhetoric about bridging electoral, cultural, and regional divides, sensing that Obama is speaking to them too.

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
Keywords:  Barack Obama 

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

  • Name: Gary
    Date posted: 2009-01-29 12:06 PM
    Hometown: Chapel Hill, NC

    Comment:

    Empire said " have had enough of people who supported Hillary Clinton hating on Obama. Hillary supported her husband's decision to sign and anti-gay law, and Hillary never spoke about gay issues unless she was at some fundraiser in a Greenwich Village loft." Those are lies Empire. Hillary has always been a friend of the gay community, and it was Obama allies like Sam Nunn who pushed DADT down our throats when Bill tried to end the discrimination in the miliatry. Hillary has attended the NY gay pride even nearly every year since she's been a senator and openly courted us during her campaign. If you choose to go through life with blinders, keep it to yourself.


  • Name: Gary
    Date posted: 2009-01-29 12:02 PM
    Hometown: Chapel Hill, NC

    Comment:

    are you insane? the most pro-gay candidate in us history? I guess you don't know history before the year 2000. (here's a clue--neither Bill or Hillary Clinton would have had hatemonger Rick Warren at their inauguration) Barack Obama is not only NOT pro-gay, he is a raging homophobe with a huge dose of misogyny thrown in. If you think he is going to do anything but make empty promises to secure our votes and our money you're crazy. And why should he? You all keep kissing his ass despite repeated slaps in the face to our community. The democratic party has made it clear that they are done taking a stand for us because it costs them votes. they are cowards and the sooner we admit that and stop fawning over bigots like Obama the better.


  • Name: Justin
    Date posted: 2009-01-27 3:30 PM
    Hometown: Brooklyn, NY

    Comment:

    With all these Obama haters out there, would you be better off with senator Hillary or Mcshame? either way, the two party system disapoint and let us all down... AGAIN. So much for democracy.


  • Name: Paul
    Date posted: 2009-01-27 5:46 AM
    Hometown: Dallas

    Comment:

    I'm afraid that for "his supporters (to) maintain he doesn’t have an antigay bone in his body" may end up being a bit like Bush's supporters saying he didn't have a racist bone in his body. Honestly I have no idea whether or not either did or didn't, but I also don't care. It's what they do in office, not whether "some of my best friends are...". I don't have high hopes that Obama will take any bold actions to advance gay issues, especially in his first term, but I do hope and expect that his judicial appointments will create a climate where effective leadership can emerge from other quarters. In the meantime, he'll dust off the speech he gave to gay donors in the primary season, and make the same non-commitment commitments to get re-elected.


  • Name: David
    Date posted: 2009-01-24 9:28 AM
    Hometown: Fort Lauderdale

    Comment:

    Obama said and "promised" lots of stuff for GLBT Ameicans. I recently read at PlanetOut that he wants to pass a same srex marriage law. This would not be labeled as "marriage"; but would still give same sxe couples ALL the legal rights that straight married couples enjoy. I had been against the use of ANY word to replace "marriage" in a same sex partmership. These days, I am exhausted and just want THIS administration to get with REALITY already and pass a same sex marriage act; whatever they want to call it. ALL Americans should be treated with equality!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  • Name: Doug McCulley
    Date posted: 2009-01-20 8:33 PM
    Hometown: Va. Beach

    Comment:

    Obama needs to do something dramatic to show/prove he's in favor of gay rights...LBJ appointed a black man to the Supreme Court at the height of the civil rights movement, we deserve the same...a cabinet post or the next supreme court seat...not just the head of the typing pool....this is the only way I'll be conviced he gives a damn about us...I won't be holding my breath. We're in for 4 years of lip service


  • Name: get real
    Date posted: 2009-01-17 7:09 PM
    Hometown: maine

    Comment:

    It's time all the Obama backers stopped their self delusion: Obama is no friend to the gay community. Until we as a community admit that, we'll waste the chance to have Obama begrudgingly do something for us. Also, it's comically absurd so please stop feigning surprise about Warren. Recall--Obama pulled an anti-gay preacher out of his pocket to secure votes during two critical stages of the primary. The message was clear: I am for change for all (except the gays, of course, just like you and not like Clinton, so I won't waste our capital on that). Now Obama desires to brush off the patina of far-leftist he curried to win the primary, so bring out the gay-bashing preacher! Obama's no-show post h8 is deafening. Imagine prop h8 pretained to Asians, Jews, Latinos, Black, brunettes, the blind---do you think Obama would be hand-sitting????? Let's not waste our time pretending we have a sheep in Obama when we've seen wolf's teeth.


  • Name: Empire
    Date posted: 2009-01-14 5:23 PM
    Hometown: New York, NY

    Comment:

    I have had enough of people who supported Hillary Clinton hating on Obama. Hillary supported her husband's decision to sign and anti-gay law, and Hillary never spoke about gay issues unless she was at some fundraiser in a Greenwich Village loft. She also hired anti-gay clergy in the Obama was against Bill Clinton's anti-gay law from the beginning, and spoke about gay equality in front of black ministers who were opposed to it. If you supported Dennis Kucinich or Mike Gravel, then you have every right to complain about Obama not being gay-supportive enough. Otherwise, I don't want to hear it.


  • Name: Steven White
    Date posted: 2009-01-13 7:47 PM
    Hometown: wintersville

    Comment:

    I think that we as a gay community should band together to make our voice known to Obama and to other politicans that we do count, not just at the voting booth but at the time after they are elected to gain our rights, that they have promised.


  • Name: Henry Roberts
    Date posted: 2009-01-13 7:07 AM
    Hometown: London, UK

    Comment:

    Activist groups such as HRC and Freedom to Marry continue to advance radical demands for full marriage equality despite it being abundantly clear (Prop 8) that we are still a long way from this carrying the support of the moderate majority. Real advances for LGBT people will only be achieved through measures not alienating the moderate majority. Legal equality is what matters most right now, and the international experience (eg. in the UK) shows this can be achieved through Civil Partnerships, which are far less objectionable and generally carry wide support of the moderate majority. Activist groups like HRC and Freedom to Marry purport to represent the LGBT community, yet do it no favours by continuing to demand radical and unrealistic outcomes which alienate the moderate majority. Somebody please shut them up!


  • Name: Kris
    Date posted: 2009-01-10 11:23 AM
    Hometown: Phoenix

    Comment:

    And can The Advocate quit putting these good for nothing breeders on the cover!!! This magazines mission should be to cover GLBT people that make a difference in the community or contribute something!!!! I see enough good for nothing breeders on 99% of the magazines out there, don't need to see them on The Advocate...especially this phony.


  • Name: Kris
    Date posted: 2009-01-10 11:20 AM
    Hometown: Phoenix

    Comment:

    Joey from Chicago--you hit it 100% Dems and Obama are no more our allies than Repubs. Quit giving Dems the benefit of the doubt and vote / denote to a third party. It's time for our community to drop the Dems!!


  • Name: Jacky
    Date posted: 2009-01-09 6:48 PM
    Hometown: South Burlington, VT

    Comment:

    I share all the frustrations and disappointments that come through in the postings. There is NO OTHER SIDE to respect, inclusion, and equality that has any merit or place in our country...you know the "home of the free?" What would be the reaction from other communities if Holocaust deniers and the Ku Kluz Klan were invitied to take an active role in the inauguration in the spirit of bringing people together ? The outrage would be deafening and understandably so. It seems to me that the clamor is once again coming from one direction...LGBTQ! I think if a religious focus MUST be part of the ceremony, then Bishop Gene Robinson of New hampshire would have been an excellent and appropriate choice. It would cost this country nothing to ensure that all Americans have equal rights. It still amazes and saddens me that this discussion even has to take place in 2009. All of us will need to find the strength to continue the good fight.


  • Name: Lyndon
    Date posted: 2009-01-06 3:44 PM
    Hometown: Dayton, Ohio

    Comment:

    While we must give Obama the chance as President to prove his commitment to our community, we cannot allow his selection of Rick Warren to go unchallenged. I understand his attempts at inclusiveness by giving Warren a prominent spot in his inaugural, but Obama should do likewise with a TRULY progressive theologian. We cannot remain silent and allow our lives and rights to be ignored. We should undertake a peaceful and respectful protest during Warren's inaugural invocation by wearing a visible LGBT symbol such as rainbow attire or pink triangle (to symbolize the historical aspect of our struggle for equality dating back to Nazi Germany). And, during Warren's remarks, we should turn our backs to the stage. Those watching on TV or online, should wait to tune into (or tune away from) the inauguration until AFTER Warren's invocation. As with women, African-Americans, Jews and Catholics before us, silence cannot be an option in our struggle for equality.


  • Name: Big Mike
    Date posted: 2009-01-06 2:51 PM
    Hometown: San Diego, California

    Comment:

    I said it once and I'll say it again, I did not and I repeat did not vote for Obama because I love him, but because he was better than Mccain. And I think it is fair to give him a chance to make good on his promises. I mean he isn't even President, yet. Of course he is a politician, and will say and do what ever is needed to get the vote. But I still say it was better to take a chance on him than John Mccain.


  • Name: Joey
    Date posted: 2009-01-06 2:25 PM
    Hometown: cHicago

    Comment:

    When are we going to wake up and see that democrats are no different the Republicans. We need to vote Stonewall Dems and Log Cabin Republican. We need our voice and the voices of those who support us. Obama never did anything for our community and still has been silent. Trust me, everything will come before our rights in the next 4 years. He doesn't even attend the Chicago Gay pride parade when dozen democrats and even republicans do. Yet all my friends claim he our silent partner ready to CHANGE american to fit a gay agenda. You can all sit by and defend this party and Obama but you will never get anywhere except for tricked. TIm Kaine who Obama personally chose to lead the DNC hmanti-gay, BIG SURPRISE WAKE UP GAY AMERICA.P.S. Can this magazine stop putting out fluff articles on politicans and ask some real quesions..Maybe like why should a gay voter vote for you when you have never done anything for our community.


  • Name: Joey
    Date posted: 2009-01-06 2:24 PM
    Hometown: CHicago

    Comment:

    Obama got what he needed your money and your vote. HE WILL NEVER BE A A FRIEND OF THE GAY COMMUNITY, well at lest not till 2012. When all the blind sheep/gays will go and donate and campaign and vote for a man that chose a gay hate tour/gospel tour, Rick Warren, to back pedal on dont ask dont tell/ He is against gay marriage but wants to repeal Doma HELLLO he is using us. Were being played to get him into office and about 74% fell right into line. Then cried and protested when prop 8 passed with the help of a silent Obama/Biden/


  • Name: Joey
    Date posted: 2009-01-06 2:24 PM
    Hometown: CHicago

    Comment:

    Obama got what he needed your money and your vote. HE WILL NEVER BE A A FRIEND OF THE GAY COMMUNITY, well at lest not till 2012. When all the blind sheep/gays will go and donate and campaign and vote for a man that chose a gay hate tour/gospel tour, Rick Warren, to back pedal on dont ask dont tell/ He is against gay marriage but wants to repeal Doma HELLLO he is using us. Were being played to get him into office and about 74% fell right into line. Then cried and protested when prop 8 passed with the help of a silent Obama/Biden/


  • Name: beachcomberT
    Date posted: 2009-01-06 3:24 AM
    Hometown: Daytona Beach

    Comment:

    I'm dismayed by the line of argument that says Obama and Congress will be "too busy" with rescuing the economy, fixing healthcare, etc. to do anything right away to benefit LGBT equality. The federal government always is doing 1,000 different things at once -- mostly adding regulations and tax code tweaks to benefit particular industries and interest groups. Congress can easily work on some gay legislation this year -- if it's pushed hard enough by our so-called leaders. Don't expect Obama to be out in front on gay issues; ever the politician, he's already worrying about getting re-elected.


  • Name: james
    Date posted: 2009-01-06 12:10 AM
    Hometown: Seattle

    Comment:

    You take the one candidate who isn’t afraid to publicly support gay marriage and run her through the meat grinder. Now we are stuck with another politician who will say anything, to get elected…and all of you are shocked and hurt that when the gay community, that most gullible and impractical of entities, became an inconvenient truth for our president-elect, was flushed down the political toilet. I read a December 20, 2008 NYTimes article in which Obama has insisted on a “wide range of viewpoints” being presents during his inauguration. Okay, fine. So if we’re entertaining anti-gay viewpoints where are those gentle men and women who have anti-black, anti-muslim, anti-immigrant viewpoints? Will they be represented? We so deserve this Rick Warren thing...you can guarandamntee that Hilary Rodham Clinton would have had a wonderful, passionate humanitarian like Maya Angelou giving the address...we reap what we sow, kittens. Grow up and be smarter next time.


  • Name: james
    Date posted: 2009-01-06 12:06 AM
    Hometown: seattle

    Comment:

    You take the one candidate who isn’t afraid to publicly support gay marriage and run her through the meat grinder. Now we are stuck with another politician who will say anything to get elected…and all of you are shocked and hurt that when the gay community, that most gullible and impractical of entities, became an inconvenient truth for our president-elect, was flushed down the political toilet. I read a December 20, 2008 NYTimes article in which Obama has insisted on a “wide range of viewpoints” being presents during his inauguration. Okay, fine. So if we’re entertaining anti-gay viewpoints where are those gentle men and women who have anti-black, anti-muslim, anti-immigrant viewpoints? Will they be represented? We so deserve this Rick Warren thing...you can guarandamntee that Hilary Rodham Clinton would have had a wonderful, passionate humanitarian like Maya Angelou giving the address...we reap what we sow, kittens. Grow up and be smarter next time.


  • Name: Wilberforce
    Date posted: 2009-01-05 11:50 PM
    Hometown: Seattle

    Comment:

    He's our friend, of course, and will try to help us. But there are other issues and millions of people who are not our friends. We can't expect him to bow to our every whim, which is what many seem to expect. For example, he needs wide support for his domestic agenda, which is why he chose Warren. It's insulting, sure. But get over it. Going for marraige was a strategic mistake anyway, given that many straights support domestic partnership. But the community can't stop shooting itself in the foot. Likewise, the Clintons made the best deal possible on dodt and went to the mat for healthcare. That was a good choice, especially considering our community's need for medical care. Please, get some perspective.


  • Name: Dean
    Date posted: 2009-01-05 9:19 PM
    Hometown: Corunna, Michigan

    Comment:

    "Given this series of grueling tasks, is it realistic to expect Barack Obama to make gay-related issues a real priority?" Given the ongoing fight for our civil rights (as opposed to a "social issue"), is it realistic of Barack Obama to NOT make gay-related issues a real priority??? Does he really want to go there in this economy with a group of people that contribute upwards of $641 Billion (that's with a "B", folks) to the economy??? An ever more angry group of people who are still fighting for their rights???


  • Name: Dean
    Date posted: 2009-01-05 9:03 PM
    Hometown: Corunna, Michigan

    Comment:

    "Given this series of grueling tasks, is it realistic to expect Barack Obama to make gay-related issues a real priority?" Given the ongoing fight for our civil rights (as opposed to a "social issue"), is it realistic of Barack Obama to NOT make gay-related issues a real priority??? Does he really want to go there in this economy with a group of people that contribute upwards of $641 Billion (that's with a "B", folks) to the economy??? An ever more angry group of people who are still fighting for their rights???


  • Name: Karen Jensen
    Date posted: 2009-01-05 9:03 PM
    Hometown: Burnie, Tasmania, Austraila

    Comment:

    I am Australian who is in a long term same sex relationship with a US citizen. So the pass of the uniting American families act would be the best. I hope it happens. My partner and I have been together for eight and a half years. We only see each other for a few weeks every 16 to 18 months. That isn't good enough for either of us.


  • Name: Brian
    Date posted: 2009-01-05 9:03 PM
    Hometown: St. Louis

    Comment:

    Two months ago, I would have agreed with this article 100%. I literally would have bet my life savings that all of this would take place. Now, I wouldn't bet a dime that any of this will happen. I think Obama is just another politician--he'll do what is best for him despite his words about inclusion and hope. I don't want to listen to any more of his promises or glib assurances. I'll believe him when he signs these measures into law. Then, I will forgive him for his Rick Warren fiasco (but I won't forget). Warren was a deliberate and calculated insult to the gay community, and don't ever forget it. Obama added insult to injury by shutting us out of all cabinet positions. Remember that the next time he mentions inclusion. All straight politicans have to be watched by our community very closely. We have to become very skeptical of their promises. Don't trust any of them.


  • Name: Equal Rights a Must
    Date posted: 2009-01-05 8:23 PM
    Hometown: Bloomington

    Comment:

    Dear Richard...read the article more carefully: see quote "...supports the Uniting American Families Act, which gives the same-sex partners of American citizens the same access to the immigration system as heterosexual spouses." As a person in a same-sex relationship with someone from a country outside of the US, I agree that this issue is of critical importance (as loving, long time partners can be torn apart until such a law is passed)! This is a central lack of equal rights for many gay Americans who are suffering because they have been separated from their deeply beloved partners (sometimes after many, many years together). It's criminal that more attention is not given to this ongoing tragedy for gay Americans and their foreign partners. However, it was mentioned in the article and it is a part of Obama's platform to have UAFA instituted. May it happen soon!


  • Name: Steph
    Date posted: 2009-01-05 8:20 PM
    Hometown: Chicago, IL

    Comment:

    Why is everyone so suprised by his lack of interest with LGBT? I am from Chicago and new he wouldn't do anything except bring in the political crooks from this State.


  • Name: Sylvia
    Date posted: 2009-01-05 5:16 PM
    Hometown: Sun City

    Comment:

    Obama Showbama! We have been hoodwinked again and hoist on our own petard. We gave money and support to the cute guy and fell under the spell of his mesmorizing speeches. The good ole boy network is alive and well in the gay community as well as in the straight. So wacha gonna do 'bout it? Oh, yeah, be patient, give the guy a chance, it's early days yet, blah blah blah. Why did the US hold out on signing the international hate law at the UN? The answer gave credence to the unconstitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act. The time has come, ladies and gentlement, for us to really get a campaign for cases before the Supreme Court of the land to judge discrimination against a minority group unconstitutional once and for all and that States do not have the right to usurp that decision. Hear me California? Arkansas? Florida? Arizona? etc etc etc


  • Name: Dan
    Date posted: 2009-01-05 4:41 PM
    Hometown: Pittsfield

    Comment:

    I'm afraid it's a case of "love 'em and leave 'em."


  • Name: Granny
    Date posted: 2009-01-05 4:26 PM
    Hometown: Menifee, CA

    Comment:

    So far Obama has shown me no change at all. Poor choices for high positions, crooks having to step down from their nominations to higher posts, more Clinton administration people. We should have elected Hillary and that is a fact. I think she would be less Clintonian than Obama is. I am sorry he won the election as I supported Hillary up to the end. Well people we are screwed again and we are as bad as the Log Cabin Republicans because we never learn our lesson from the politicians. Because of his choices so far I am not planning to watch the Inaguration on the TV. I will find me a good book and read it or go to a movie. Obama is a bull poop artist and why oh why didn't a lot of us see through him. Zebras don't change their stripes so don't expect anything good to come from this one. Of course the alternative would have been even worse.


  • Name: Chris Sullivan
    Date posted: 2009-01-05 4:08 PM
    Hometown: Chicago, IL

    Comment:

    That's all Obama has produced so far - words. His actions, to date, have actually been insulting to the GLBT community. When he actually DOES something - then I'll be impressed.


  • Name: sunoverla
    Date posted: 2009-01-05 3:02 PM
    Hometown: West Hollywood, CA

    Comment:

    he'll have us grab our ankles like every other politician! change we can believe in my #$% --sun


  • Name: Trevor
    Date posted: 2009-01-05 2:47 PM
    Hometown: Pasadena, CA

    Comment:

    What have Democrats EVER done for gay and lesbians in this country????????????????? The Clintons certainly screwed us over. Demo's just pat us on the head and see be good little gays and lesbians and we might do something you like. AND gay/lesbian leaders start salivating at the mouth and get all googly eyed thinking the Dem's love us. What morons!


  • Name: Richard Givens
    Date posted: 2009-01-05 2:40 PM
    Hometown: Las Vegas, NV

    Comment:

    AGAIN, and again, the writers for this magazine neglect the issue of Immigration Equality for Gay and Lesbian Americans. NO mention of the Uniting American Familes Act was made in this article. This important legislation would allow US citizens to sponsor their foreign-born permanent partners for immigration in the same manner as opposite-sex couples are allowed. For some reason this magzine and its writers have a blindspot to this issue. They didn't ask Barney Frank about it, or Tammy Baldwin or Barack Obama, yet interviews with all three have appeared in the magazine in recent months. GET ON BOARD PEOPLE! This issue was voted the #3 issue for Gay Issues on the Change.gov website. Why does the writing and editorial staff of the Advocate remain ignorant of this important issue?


Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max. HTML formatting and hyperlinks are NOT permitted.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

Error:Server capacity reached.
Error:Server capacity reached. Subscribe to the digital edition. Subscribe to the print edition.
Error:Server capacity reached.