Governors ignore gay marriage at annual meeting
February 25 2004 1:00 AM ET
Gay marriage may be drawing protesters by the hundreds, the attention of courts in Massachusetts and California, and the scrutiny of President Bush, but the nation's governors officially ignored it at their meeting on the top issues facing the states. The governors are in Washington for four days of discussions at the annual meeting of the National Governors Association. Democratic governors see it either as a distraction from the failures of President Bush or a wedge issue that the GOP can use to rally conservative voters in the fall, and they insist the matter should be dropped. "Let's stay focused on jobs," Bob Holden of Missouri said Monday.
The topic isn't high on the agenda for many Republicans either. But some GOP governors believe it undermines moral values in the country and view that as a factor that could help GOP chances in the fall election. "It grieves me that we even have to think it would be necessary to pass a constitutional amendment to define marriage as between a man and a woman," said Republican governor Mike Huckabee of Arkansas. "It never occurred to me that we would have states that would define marriage in a way that has no historical precedent ever, none."
He and several other Southern or conservative GOP governors expressed strong support for an amendment and decried what they saw as activist judges and mayors challenging the laws that they are supposed to uphold. Thirty-nine states have passed laws banning gay marriage. The issue has leaped ahead in the public debate, as the Massachusetts supreme judicial court ruled this month that anything less than full-fledged marriage for gays in Massachusetts would be unconstitutional. Since then, San Francisco officials have begun performing same-sex marriages and have challenged California law banning such unions.
Those unnerved by the changes say that if one state makes such marriages legal, other states would have to recognize them. "It looks like the federal government is going to have to step in in order to protect state law," said Republican governor Haley Barbour of Mississippi. Those that support it, he said, are "180 degrees apart from the American people," adding that voters should examine the records of the Democratic presidential candidates on the issue.
Democrats just want the question to go away. "As I travel my state, people want to know where the next job is going to come from. 'Are my children being well educated?"' said Iowa governor Tom Vilsack, a Democrat. "Those are the issues that people address to me." Gay marriage? He doesn't hear about it, Vilsack said in comments echoed by many other Democrats. "It's not an issue in my state," said Gov. Jennifer Granholm of Michigan. "I'm certain the Republicans want this as an issue. There will be an attempt to make it an issue, a wedge issue."
The GOP has looked at it and seen that for some voters, the issue is important enough for them to get out and vote, according to Bill McInturff, a GOP pollster who briefed a meeting of the Republican Governors Association over the weekend. "This is going to be a part of the 2004 campaign," McInturff said.
In Massachusetts, Republican governor Mitt Romney has written newspaper editorials against sanctioning gay marriages and said legal protections for gays, lesbians, and singles go far enough.
- Brokeback Mountain: The 10th Anniversary of a Gay Classic
- The Top 175 Essential Films of All Time for LGBT Viewers
- 10 Things People Living With HIV Are Sick of Hearing
- The 'Ex-Gay' Candidate for Missouri Governor
- Queer Women in Their 30s Give Advice to Their 20-Something Selves
- Even the Rehearsal Footage From Madonna's Rebel Heart Tour Is Spellbinding