The Massachusetts
high court heard a bid Monday that seeks to prevent any
more gay and lesbian couples from getting married in the
state until residents have a chance to vote next year
on a constitutional amendment banning same-sex
marriages. The lawyer for C.J. Doyle, executive director
of the Catholic Action League of Massachusetts, argued that
such marriages interfere with voters' ability to
participate in the "robust debate" that is required on
such an issue.
But justices, even two who dissented in the 2003
decision that legalized same-sex marriages in the
state, seemed skeptical. "How has the full and robust
public discourse been inhibited?" asked Justice Robert
Cordy, one of the dissenters in 2003. "It seems to me,
if anything, it's been enlivened on this subject.... I
don't see how it gets inhibited by the fact that the
court has made a constitutional ruling."
Approximately 5,000 gay and lesbian couples have
gotten married in the state since the supreme judicial
court's ruling took effect in May 2004. In March 2004
the state legislature approved a constitutional amendment
that would ban same-sex marriage. Lawmakers must pass the
measure a second time, either this year or next,
before it can reach the statewide ballot in November 2006.
Justice Roderick Ireland rejected Doyle's
arguments last year. It was heard on appeal Monday by
the full court, which did not immediately rule.
Justice Martha Sosman, who wrote the 2003 dissenting
opinion, said that unless it's proved that Ireland
erred in his ruling, then "that's the end of it." The
justices didn't ask any questions of an attorney for Gay and
Lesbian Advocates and Defenders or of state assistant
attorney general John Hitt, who later declined to
comment. GLAD lawyer Michele Granda said she was
confident the court would rule against Doyle. Doyle's
attorney, Chester Darling, expressed similar
sentiments. "It was a little negative, from our point
of view," he said. (AP)