Pennsylvania
court affirms rights of lesbian mother

In a groundbreaking ruling in support of the rights of gay and lesbian parents, a court in Pennsylvania on Tuesday said the lesbian partner of the biological parent of twins should have primary custody of the children. The decision, by the superior court, upheld a lower court ruling that Patricia Jones would provide a better home than her ex-partner, Ellen Boring, even though Boring is the biological mother of the twins. "We believe that the record supports a finding by clear and convincing evidence that the best interests of the children are served by granting primary physical custody to Jones, for a number of reasons discussed in the trial court's opinion," a unanimous three-judge panel stated in its opinion.

"We are pleased to see that the court kept its eye on the prize--the children's best interests--and granted primary physical custody to the parent who is best able to provide a stable and loving home, regardless of biology," said Alphonso David, a staff attorney for Lambda Legal who argued the case before the court. "This means that even though there is often just one biological parent in families headed by same-sex couples, biology alone does not trump the best interests of the child." Jones was represented by Lambda Legal, the National Center for Lesbian Rights, the Center for Lesbian and Gay Civil Rights, and local counsel Maureen Gatto of Dorian, Goldstein, Wisniewski, and Orchinik in Bensalem, Pa.

Jones and Boring were partners for 14 years. During that time they planned a family, resulting in twins for whom both Jones and Boring served as caregivers. After the couple split up in 2001, the trial court found that Jones had parental rights to the children and awarded joint custody to both mothers, giving primary physical custody to Boring. Later Jones filed for primary physical custody, citing Boring's history of contempt in observing the visitation schedule set by the court and her attempts to unilaterally remove the children from Pennsylvania. The court found "convincing reasons" that being in Jones's custody would be in the best interest of the children and awarded her primary physical custody. That ruling was appealed by Boring, contending that as she was the children's biological mother and former primary custodian, the children could not be removed from her custody without a finding she is unfit, a very high standard. The superior court of Pennsylvania found that argument to be invalid and upheld the lower court's decision to grant custody to Jones. (Advocate.com)