A new study
published this month in the journal Military
Psychology shows that U.S. military commanders
often perpetrate or witness antigay harassment and those who
are being harassed often fail to report it.
"Antigay
harassment remains a daily reality for our men and women in
uniform," said C. Dixon Osburn, executive director of
Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, an advocacy
group for gay service personnel. "Pentagon
leaders have failed to implement their Anti-Harassment
Action Plan and have openly acknowledged that they have
no plans to more aggressively enforce measures to protect
service members from antigay harassment."
The study was
conducted and written by professor Bonnie Moradi of the
psychology department at University of Florida and was
commissioned by the Center for the Study of Sexual
Minorities in the Military, a think tank at the
University of California, Santa Barbara. It was designed to
compare data obtained in a 2000 Defense Department survey of
antigay harassment to parallel incidents in the
civilian population.
The military poll
had surveyed over 71,000 active duty service members
from 38 randomly selected installations and found that 80%
had heard offensive speech, including derogatory names
and jokes, targeted at gays during the previous year,
and 5% had witnessed a violent antigay assault.
Researchers involved in the current study sought to assess
whether the high incidence of antigay harassment
reflected similar patterns in the general population
or might instead be attributable to norms or policies
that were specific to military culture.
Moradi modeled a
poll after the military survey. She conducted it using a
civilian sample of 196 young adults, all drawn from a
college in the American South, whose demographic
profile roughly matched the military sample. The
answers of these 196 respondents were then compared to those
of 200 randomly selected participants in the Defense
Department survey.
The study found
that compared with civilian respondents, a greater
proportion of military respondents who reported a harassment
incident indicated that a senior person perpetrated
the harassment. Among the civilians who reported
witnessing a harassment incident, 7% indicated that a
person of authority committed such abuse, while among
military respondents who reported witnessing an
incident, 15% of respondents claimed a supervisor or
commander had done so.
"Until official
policy stops targeting gays," said Aaron Belkin,
director of CSSMM, "it will be difficult for commanders to
crack down on antigay harassment. The institution
simply cannot make a serious dent in the rate of abuse
as long is it continues to fire people simply for
saying they are gay." (The Advocate)