
Nearing the end
of an unprecedented run of long-delayed confirmations,
the U.S. Senate on Thursday approved former Alabama attorney
general William Pryor for a seat on the U.S.
appeals court. With a vote of 53-45, Pryor was
approved for the 11th U.S. circuit court of appeals
in Atlanta, which handles federal appeals from Alabama,
Georgia, and Florida.
Pryor, who already had a temporary seat, along
with Janice Rogers Brown and Priscilla Owen had
been waiting at least two years for Senate
confirmation. Democrats have blocked the nominations of the
judges because they were considered too
conservative. "Judge Pryor was passed out of committee
two years ago before twice being filibustered," said
Republican senator Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas.
"Judge Pryor is a distinguished jurist who deserves to be confirmed."
The gay rights group Human Rights Campaign
strongly condemned the Pryor confirmation because
he has a demonstrated track record of bias against the
rights of GLBT people. "The American people deserve
justice, not prejudice," said HRC president Joe Solmonese.
"We thank senators from both parties who stood with us
and the civil rights community, and we will continue
to advocate for fair-minded judges and against radical
nominees who would roll back basic civil rights. With
judges like Pryor on the courts of appeal, the Supreme Court
is more important than ever."
As Alabama attorney general, Pryor consistently
demonstrated bias against GLBT Americans, linking the
state government Web site to antigay advocacy groups.
In a friend-of-the-court brief filed in the Lawrence v.
Texas case, Pryor compared homosexuality to
bestiality and pedophilia. Last year, after receiving a
recess appointment to the 11th circuit, Pryor cast the
deciding vote to deny rehearing a challenge to
Florida's antigay adoption law. "Anyone who lets their
own personal prejudices shape their decisions from the
bench poses a threat to the rights of all Americans," added Solmonese.
More than 175 national groups opposed Pryor's
appointment, including the Log Cabin Republicans,
Lambda Legal, the NAACP, NARAL Pro-Choice America,
People for the American Way, the Sierra Club, and World
Association of Persons With Disabilities.
Democratic leaders also wanted Pryor
stopped, saying he will be a conservative vote against
civil rights, women's rights, and the environment.
"This is truly the trifecta on civil rights here this
week in Washington, to confirm Janice Rogers Brown and
William Pryor and to report Terrence Boyle from this
committee," said Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois, the
Senate's number 2 Democrat. "When it comes to the
issue of civil rights, it's a sad week."
The Senate also plans to confirm two other
nominees, Michigan judges David McKeague and Richard
Griffin, to the sixth circuit in Cincinnati, and it
expects to advance the nomination of Terrence Boyle, a North
Carolina judge nominated to the fourth circuit in Richmond,
Va. It takes 60 votes to bypass a filibuster.
Republicans were able to get only 53 votes for Pryor
in July 2003 and only 51 votes that November. Bush
bypassed the filibustering Democrats by giving Pryor a
temporary appointment to the 11th circuit in February
2004, a recess appointment that expires at the end of
the year.
Pryor's stint on the Atlanta court has not
caused any controversy, a point noted by Senate
Judiciary chairman Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania
Republican, who circulated some of Pryor's writings on that
court hoping it would sway some Democratic votes. The
Atlanta-based court helped to decide the fate of Terri
Schiavo, the brain-damaged woman whose parents and
husband fought all the way to the Supreme Court over whether
to keep her alive. The federal courts refused to stop
the removal of her feeding tube.
Pryor has never made public which way he voted
in the Schiavo case. One of the court's orders did say
Pryor did not vote because he is recovering from
surgery. Pryor opposes abortion rights and has criticized
the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision. But
he promised that he would follow the law if confirmed
for the regional court, one step below the Supreme Court.
The deadlocks over the nominations of Pryor,
Brown, and Owen ended under last month's historic deal
on judicial filibusters. Crafted by Senate centrists,
it avoided a partisan showdown over the White House's
judicial nominees. A vote in the Senate Judiciary
Committee on Boyle was delayed Thursday morning, but
committee senators plan to try to meet again Thursday
evening to move his nomination to the full Senate for
confirmation. Senators plan to leave Bush's other
controversial nominees dangling while they wait to see
if there's a Supreme Court debate in their future.
(AP, Advocate.com)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.