One of the year's
most acclaimed films is queer director Gregg Araki's
adaptation of Scott Heim's Mysterious Skin, but the
pedophilia story line is causing some Australian activists
to call for a ban of the film before it opens there in
August. The Sydney Morning Herald reports that the
film, which has already received a strict R18+ rating, has
had an application filed against it that would ban it from
theatrical release. Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Brady Corbet
play two teenagers who were molested as children by their
baseball coach.
The Morning Herald reports that federal
attorney general Philip Ruddock is pursuing the film's
reclassification after being contacted by South Australian
attorney general Michael Atkinson, who, it is believed, has
been lobbied by right-wing activist groups the Australian
Family Association and the Festival of Light. AFA spokesman
Richard Egan said, "Being able to get hold legally of a DVD
where they can play the scene over and over again, showing
the adult baseball coach fellating an 8-year-old boy...could
prove very helpful to some pedophiles." Margaret Pomeranz,
president of the lobby group Watch on Censorship, disagrees.
"This is a film about the damage that pedophilia creates.
It's been so carefully filmed, the impact is on the
audience.... Pedophiles could watch this film and be
stricken by remorse. It could be a pedophile-curing film
because they're confronted by the damage they do."
Australia's Office of Film and Literature
Classification, in giving Mysterious Skin the R18+
rating, described the film as "a serious and legitimate
exploration of a disturbing and confronting theme. The film
takes the victims' viewpoint and presents the dark and bleak
nature of the abuse to which they are subjected and the
resulting impact on their lives."
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.