A group of
Marylanders who describe themselves as progressive
Christians is forming a new organization to try to
counter conservative religious groups that they say
are dominating political debate over moral and
religious issues. "We've allowed the Christian right to
commandeer and exclusively appropriate the term
Christian for themselves," said Paul Verduin of
Silver Spring, one of the organizers of Maryland
Christians for Justice and Peace. "It is not only the
Christian right that owns the name Christian. We
refuse to be marginalized by some of their right-wing
and extreme positions."
Conservative and fundamentalist churches that
once avoided politics have become increasingly
active in national and state politics over the last
three decades, lobbying state and federal legislators on
issues such as abortion, stem cell research, and
same-sex marriage.
Conservative religious groups played an
important role in some battleground states in the 2004
presidential election, including Florida and Ohio,
both of which President Bush won. The 20 people who gathered
last weekend at an Episcopal church in Columbia to talk
about the future of Maryland Christians for Justice
and Peace came from a variety of religious
backgrounds—Church of Christ, Lutheran, Methodist,
and Roman Catholic, among others—and have been
activists on issues such as war, the environment,
civil rights, and help for the poor and elderly.
With the group in its early stages, members are
trying to figure out how they will operate and what
issues to concentrate on. But the participants in the
recent meeting were united in a belief that the most
important teachings of Jesus are not those that are
dominating the political dialogue in Maryland and the nation.
William Neil, who moved last year to Montgomery
County from New Jersey, was drawn to the meeting by a
belief that "the Christian right has a monopoly on the
debate." "Balancing who brings what into the political
system is very important," Neil said. The religious right
is destroying the nation's moral compass by directing its
energies into two issues, abortion and gay rights, he
said. "I think it's a distortion of the Christian gospel."
Carrie Gordon Earll, spokeswoman for Focus on
the Family, a national political action group that
rallied evangelical Christians during the last
presidential campaign, said there is plenty of room in the
political system for Christian groups that want to
work on issues such as peace and aid to the poor.
But if the organization is being formed "because
they want to advocate the killing of pre-born children
and approval of homosexual marriage, then they will
meet us in the public arena because we oppose those
things based on biblical values," Gordon said. "If they are
forming this group in the spirit of criticism, I suggest
their motivations are misguided," she said.
While several people involved in setting up the
new group mentioned the religious right's focus on
abortion and gay rights, those issues were not part of
the discussion and weren't included in a list of potential
issues that might be the subject of lobbying
campaigns. "We're at the point where we're trying to
figure out what direction to go," said Joyce
Fitzpatrick, who came to the meeting from Grasonville in
Queen Anne's County. "I'm kind of reserving my
judgment right now." (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.