The Bush administration on Wednesday called on Congress to reauthorize the Ryan White Act and unveiled proposals for federal AIDS spending that would shift billions of dollars away from urban areas to expand medical care in poor and rural parts of the country with rising HIV rates. No significant new AIDS spending was included in the plan, which was announced by Health and Human Services secretary Michael Leavitt.
The proposals are widely expected to shape legislation being prepared to reauthorize the Ryan White Act. The current act expires on September 30 and must be renewed by Congress in order for federal HIV prevention, treatment, and support funds to continue to be allocated across the country.
In announcing the proposals, Leavitt said they aim to accomplish five key goals: serving the neediest first, focusing on life-extending services, increasing prevention efforts, increasing accountability, and increasing flexibility. Bush’s proposal would decrease overall funding to 51 large cities and divert resources to states that have rising HIV infection rates, particularly those in the South. The proposal also would require that a minimum of 75% of Ryan White dollars go to core medical programs for HIV-positive people, leaving many programs that provide such services as transportation to medical appointments, housing, legal assistance, and food banks with reduced funding.
Authority for allocation of Ryan White funds also would be diverted from local planning groups and given largely to “municipal grantees”--typically the city or county health departments that receive the bulk grants from the federal government. Instead, local planning boards will serve in an advisory capacity for funding prioritization and allotment.
Bush’s plan also calls for Health and Human Services to develop a list of “core medications” that would be prioritized through the state-run AIDS Drug Assistance Programs.
Many AIDS groups, including the HIV Medicine Association and the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, responded favorably to the proposals. “We strongly support Secretary Leavitt and HHS for today's announcement to overhaul the Ryan White CARE Act by directing more dollars toward core services, particularly the proposal to require local planning councils to direct up to 75% of Ryan White Funding toward medical care,” AHF president Michael Weinstein said in a press release.
The AIDS Institute, a Florida-based advocacy group, announced that it also welcomes the Administration’s proposals. “We are pleased the Administration has taken a direction in its recommendations that reflect the realities of today’s domestic AIDS epidemic,” said AIDS Institute executive director Gene Copello in a press release.
But some organizations have expressed concern about the spending proposals, particularly with shifting money away from urban areas with relatively stable HIV infection levels--or from those that have succeeded in lowering HIV infection rates through prevention programs. “Unfortunately, the proposal advanced by the Bush administration would shift inequities from rural and poor states to the inner cities,” the AIDS Foundation of Chicago stated in a release. “Improving HIV care in rural America--an important goal--should not come at the expense of poor people with HIV/AIDS who live in urban centers, including Chicago."
San Francisco AIDS Foundation executive director Mark Cloutier also worries that some provisions of the Bush administration proposal would “undermine the continuity of care for thousands of San Franciscans living with HIV disease.”
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.