
As a young
bisexual inmate weighing just 123 pounds, Kendell Spruce
said he made a perfect target for sexual predators.
Nine months after landing in an Arkansas prison for
violating parole for check forgery, he claimed he had
been raped by 27 fellow prisoners, including a cell mate who
infected him with HIV.
Spruce, now 42, planned to tell his story Friday
to a congressional commission studying prison rape and
sexual abuse. Other witnesses will include juveniles
attacked in adult prisons and transgender men and
women. Arkansas Correction Department spokeswoman Dina Tyler
said Spruce's allegations are untrue.
Tyler said Spruce sued the state prison system
in federal court and lost. She said his allegations
were "proved to be false." "If there was sexual
activity with Kendell Spruce, he either initiated it or was
a willing participant," Tyler said. "These are stories
he made up. He is not telling the truth."
The National Prison Rape Elimination Commission
was created by Congress and given a year to prepare a
report on the problem and propose national standards
governing the prevention, investigation, and punishment of abuse.
The commission's first hearing was held in June
in Washington and offered an overall look at the
problem, according to Judge Reggie Walton, chairman of
the bipartisan nine-member committee. "One of the things
that I have been most shocked by is, we don't know what the
extent of the problem is," he said by phone prior to
Friday's meeting in San Francisco. "I believe in tough
punishment, but I firmly believe when we incarcerate
people we're obligated to make sure they're treated humanely."
The San Francisco hearing will focus on
protecting vulnerable inmates—young people;
gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender inmates; and
the mentally ill. Among those scheduled to speak at the
daylong hearing are Department of Justice officials,
state and local lawmakers, and survivors of abuse.
Spruce, who has suffered from full-blown AIDS
since 2002, was forced to quit working and now lives
in Flint, Mich., to be closer to his family.
"Everybody needs to know what happened to me," he said of
his alleged experiences more than a dozen years ago.
"I don't want it to happen to more people."
One of the biggest hurdles advocates have faced
is public indifference and an unwillingness to take
the problem seriously. "Nobody would tell a joke on
late-night television about a woman getting raped in a
back alley," said Lovisa Stannow, acting executive director
of Stop Prisoner Rape, a nonprofit called upon by the
commission to provide survivor testimony. "Negative
stereotypes about prisoners and this perception that
it's not something that needs to be taken seriously is a
major barrier to ending this kind of violence." (Kim Curtis,
AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.