The
Milwaukee Gay Arts Center has filed a claim against the
city, contending it committed a civil rights violation
by shutting down performances of a touring musical revue.
An ordinance requiring a city theater license
was selectively enforced against the center last week
for a presentation of Naked Boys Singing because it
is a gay organization, according to the claim filed
Tuesday by attorney Richard Hart on behalf of the
group. The claim said such a permit was never required
for other productions in the past and that numerous other
venues typically present theater performances without
one. It contends that, even though the production
contains nudity, that was no excuse for the city to
shut it down Thursday.
The presentation was halted Thursday when
officers from the Milwaukee Police Department's vice
control division arrived and said the center had
failed to obtain a city theater license, required if a
production charges to see a performance. Anne E.
Schwartz, a department spokeswoman, said vice officers
handled the case because of the musical's title.
A city ordinance prohibits frontal nudity but
exempts theater and other art performances from the
ban as long as they have "serious artistic merit" and
the predominant nature of the business is not intended to
"provide sexual gratification."
The claim filed Tuesday also states that, as a
charitable organization, the center is exempt from the
theater permit requirement. It states that the center
promotes and produces theater presentations that benefit
gay-related groups and that proceeds were designated for
various AIDS research groups and theater groups.
The claim seeks $500,000 in punitive damages,
$100,000 for anticipated legal fees, $27,720 for loss
of ticket revenue, $3,000 for loss of advertisement
revenue, $1,700 for the cost of rights to the play, and
$2,000 for legal fees to date. The center applied for the
theater permit, but the request must be considered by
the common council, which is on break until September 7.
Lt. John Kaltenbrun of the Milwaukee Police
Department vice division likened the situation to a
new bar opening its doors while its tavern license has
yet to be approved and said it had absolutely nothing to do
with the nudity or content of the show. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.