The Latvian
parliament took a first step Thursday toward establishing a
constitutional ban on same-sex marriage, voting in favor of
sending the proposed amendment to a parliamentary
committee for review. Fifty-five lawmakers in the
100-seat Saeima, or parliament, voted in favor of
sending the proposed amendment for review, one voted
against, and 44 lawmakers either abstained or were absent.
If the committee approves the bill, it will go
back to the Saeima for a vote. To amend the
constitution, two thirds of the Saeima, or 67
lawmakers, would have to vote in favor. Same-sex marriage is
already banned under Latvian law, but proponents of
the bill say a constitutional amendment would
strengthen the ban in the face of greater acceptance of
same-sex unions in other European Union countries.
Inese Slesere, a First Party lawmaker, told the
Saeima that gay organizations were strongly defending
their rights in many European countries but that
same-sex unions should not be permitted in Latvia.
But after having been forced underground during
nearly five decades of Soviet occupation, which ended
in 1991, Latvia's gays lesbians have been struggling
to find a political voice and have made few public calls to
legalize same-sex marriage. About 50 Latvians marched in the
country's first-ever gay pride parade in July and were
flanked by hundreds of screaming protesters, some of
whom shouted insults and threw eggs.
Juris Lavrikovs, a Latvian in the European
branch of the International Lesbian and Gay
Association in Brussels, said next year's parliamentary
elections could be the biggest reason for the proposed
constitutional amendment. "The [gay pride] parade last
summer united the country's [ethnic] Latvians and
Russians," Lavrikovs said. "The First Party has found
a convenient enemy to attack to rally support in the run-up
to next year's elections." (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.