San
Francisco approved ballot measures to ban handguns in
San Francisco and urge the city's public high schools
and college campuses to keep out military recruiters.
The military recruitment initiative won with 60%
in favor and 40% against. Measure I, dubbed "College
Not Combat," opposes the presence of military
recruiters at public high schools and colleges.
However, it would not bar the armed forces from seeking
enlistees at city campuses, since that would put
schools at risk of losing federal funding.
Instead, Measure I encourages city officials and
university administrators to exclude recruiters and
create scholarships and training programs that would
reduce the military's appeal to young adults.
"We now have the moral weight of the city behind
us, and it's definitely a valuable asset to have in
our corner," said Bob Matthews, a College Not Combat
activist, adding that the victory would help put
pressure on the government to someday institute an actual
ban on campus military recruiting.
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.