The most vocal
critic of same-sex marriage in the Massachusetts
legislature will not seek reelection next year, according to
a published report. Rep. Philip Travis, a Democrat
from Rehoboth, told The Boston Globe he wants to
spend more time with his family and pursue other
interests, including teaching at a community college
and researching Native American history in his district.
The conservative Democrat said he leaves at a
time when the legislature is becoming more liberal,
especially since house speaker Salvatore DiMasi took
over in September 2004. "I stand on principle, and principle
leads me to be more conservative," he said. "I could say,
for who I see in the house today, that I am probably
the most conservative Democrat in the house. And I am
proud of that."
Travis, 65, has led the fight against same-sex
marriage since the state's supreme judicial court
legalized such unions in November 2003. He led
the way in getting the legislature to pass a constitutional
amendment banning same-sex marriage, and when support
for that waned, he got behind another proposal for a
same-sex marriage ban aimed at the 2008 ballot. He
stayed true to the end, earlier this week attacking a bill
that would allow pharmacies to sell hypodermic
syringes without a prescription, saying it would
encourage drug use.
Travis found himself agreeing with Gov. Mitt
Romney, a Republican, on many issues. "It's too
bad, because conservative Democrats are a vanishing
breed in Massachusetts," Romney spokesman Eric
Fehrnstrom said in an e-mail to the Globe. "Phil
Travis works hard for his district, and he is a strong
defender of traditional values. We're going to miss
his voice in the legislature."
Conservative groups, including the Massachusetts
Family Institute, will be losing an ally. "Phil is a
champion, a true champion, for family values and for
everything I think America and the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts has stood for," said president Kris Mineau.
Travis has served 12 terms in the house,
representing Rehoboth, Seekonk, and portions of
Swansea and Norton. "I came in as someone who wanted
to make a difference in government," he said. "I think I've
done that to the best of my ability, and I'm leaving
on a very high note that I accomplished very, very much."
He said his top accomplishments include several
banking bills that he helped pass, including one that
allows banks, credit unions, and other institutions to
restructure mortgages during recessions. He also had his
struggles. In 1998, while serving as chairman of the
legislative banking committee, he solicited financial
contributions for an Indian tribe in his district from
several banks at a time when his committee was
considering banking legislation. He paid a $1,500 fine and
lost his chairmanship.
Even those who disagreed with Travis on same-sex
marriage admired him. "As stridently as we disagree on
[same-sex marriage], we've always worked very well
together," said Arline Isaacson, cochairwoman of the
Massachusetts Gay and Lesbian Political Caucus, adding that
he has been a "positive and powerful" voice on many
other issues, including higher education. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.