The Supreme Court on Tuesday will hear arguments in a case that challenges a federal law preventing colleges and universities that receive federal grants from barring military recruiters from their campuses because the military discriminates against gays and lesbians. Colleges that continue to bar the recruiters can have millions in federal grants revoked under the Solomon Amendment, a law passed in 1995 and expanded in 1996 that prohibits any school that bars military recruiters from receiving grants from the departments of Defense, Education, Labor, and Health and Human Services.
Gay U.S. representative Barney Frank in 1999 spearheaded legislation that exempted federal student loan funds from the Solomon Amendment.
The case going before the high court on Tuesday, called Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights v. Rumsfeld, has been brought by a coalition of law schools that say the law is unconstitutional because it wrongly allows the military to violate their colleges’ policies banning discrimination against gays. Three law schools—New York Law School, Vermont Law School, and the William Mitchell College of Law—reportedly already have lost some federal funds because they continue to require that military recruiters adhere to their nondiscrimination policies.
The third U.S. circuit court of appeals in November 2004 ruled in favor of the colleges, but the case was appealed to the Supreme Court.
"Our armed forces should recruit among the best and brightest for service to our country. The best and brightest, however, include lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender students, too,” said Sharra E. Greer, director of law and policy for Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, which has filed an amicus brief supporting the colleges challenging the law. “Law schools are simply asking the military to adhere to the same rule as every potential employer recruiting on campus: no discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation."
A decision by the high court in the case isn’t expected for several months.
For more information on the Solomon Amendment and efforts to overturn it, go online to www.solomonresponse.org. (Advocate.com)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.