Appellate judge
Carol A. Corrigan, a former prosecutor, was sworn in as a
justice on the California supreme court after being
confirmed to replace the most conservative member of
the state's highest court.
Corrigan's first case, to be heard Tuesday, is
one of the highest-profile on the docket since the
2005–2006 term began in September. The case
concerns whether the city of Berkeley can refuse to provide
free berthing at the Berkeley Marina to the Sea
Scouts, a nonprofit group affiliated with the Boy
Scouts. The city provides free docking to nonprofit groups
but won't offer it to the Sea Scouts because of the group's
discriminatory policy regarding gays. The group maintains
that Berkeley is discriminating against it.
The supreme court this term is likely to be
asked to decide whether it's unconstitutional to bar
same-sex couples from getting married.
Corrigan, who was on the first district court of
appeal in San Francisco, is a former trial judge and
Alameda County prosecutor and was elevated to the
appeals court in 1994 by Republican former
governor Pete Wilson after changing her voter
registration from Democrat to Republican.
Immediately after her confirmation Wednesday,
she told reporters she is a "centrist," that she could
not discuss upcoming cases, and that judges "do not
own the law." "Generally, Americans think everybody
should be equal before the law," she said, noting she
changed her party affiliation to Republican because it was a
more "accurate" designation of her political beliefs.
Corrigan, 57, was unanimously approved by the
Commission on Judicial Appointments after a jovial
85-minute hearing attended by about a hundred judges,
lawyers, and the other six members of the high court.
Corrigan, who is white, Catholic, and and a
native of Stockton, was selected by Gov. Arnold
Schwarzenegger to succeed Janice Rogers Brown, the
seven-member court's most conservative judge and only black
member. Brown resigned June 30 after the U.S. Senate
confirmed her appointment to a federal appeals court
in the District of Columbia.
Three former colleagues from the Alameda County
district attorney's office spoke on her behalf. She
faced only one question from the panel when California
attorney general Bill Lockyer asked her to name her
favorite U.S. Supreme Court justice. "I can't claim to know
all of them, so I would be hesitant to pick one," she
said. The audience erupted in laughter, for about the
10th time, when she suggested she was evading the question.
A former disgruntled litigant before her was the
sole person to speak against her nomination, saying,
"She can't be trusted."
Schwarzenegger didn't see it that way. "I have
full confidence she will continue to be a thorough,
fair, and conscientious justice and will serve the
people of California with honor and dignity as a member of
our state's highest court," the governor said after
the confirmation. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.