

During his confirmation hearing for the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday, Judge Samuel Altio said he has ruled in favor of the "little guy." Within the first hour of questioning at the hearing, Alito was asked by conservative Kansas Republican senator Sam Brownback whether the so-called Defense of Marriage Act violates the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution because it says that states do not have to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states.
"I believe that scholars have expressed differing views about how it would apply in that situation, and that's an issue that may well come up within the federal courts, almost certain to do so," he said.
His answer, revealing little about how he might rule in the case, was consistent with other evasive answers Alito has provided before the Senate Judiciary Committee this week.
Alito did, however, use as an example of ruling for the "little guy" his 2004 decision in favor of a high school bullying victim who was perceived as gay.
"This was a case in which a high school student had been bullied unmercifully by other students in his school because of their perception of his sexual orientation," Alito said. "He'd been bullied to the point of attempting to commit suicide, and his parents wanted to enroll him at an adjacent public high school. And the school board said, 'No, you can't do that,' and I wrote an opinion upholding their right to have him placed in a safe school, in an adjacent municipality."
The citation is notable, considering Alito has been opposed by numerous gay rights groups, including the Human Rights Campaign and Lambda Legal.
In 1999, however, Alito did rule against a school antiharassment ordinance that was designed to protect gay students from verbal abuse. In the case of Saxe v. State College Area School District, the judge said that while harassing speech is not protected, the First Amendment protects speech that people may consider offensive, "including statements that impugn another's race or national origin or that denigrate religious beliefs."
The Alito hearings are expected to last through the week. (Matthew Berger, Sirius OutQ News)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.