Drugmakers Gilead Sciences and Bristol-Myers Squibb earlier this month announced success in combining their drugs Sustiva, Viread, and Emtriva into a single pill that is taken just once per day. Now a study in The New England Journal of Medicine shows that this simplified regimen is more effective at controlling HIV in treatment-naïve patients than even the current gold standard of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor–based therapy.
Lead by researchers at Johns Hopkins University, the study showed that the Sustiva-Viread-Emtriva combination did a better job of reducing HIV viral levels and increasing CD4-cell counts after one year of treatment that the gold-standard combination of Sustiva plus Retrovir and Epivir. Also, fewer individuals on the one-pill regimen dropped out of the study due to adverse events.
Both nonnucleoside-based regimens are currently recommended by the Department of Health and Human Services for the treatment of HIV-positive adults just beginning antiretroviral therapy. But the current study of 517 treatment-naïve HIV patients is the first to directly compare the two.
Study data showed that 84% of those taking the Sustiva-Viread-Emtriva combination pill were able to maintain an HIV viral load below 400 copies per milliliter of blood, compared to 73% of those on the Sustiva-Retrovir-Epivir combination. About 80% of those in the Sustiva-Viread-Emtriva arm suppressed HIV levels even further, to below 50 copies, compared to 70% of those taking Sustiva-Retrovir-Epivir.
Patients taking the one-pill combination also posted a mean increase in CD4-cell count of 190 cells, compared to a 158-cell increase among those taking Sustiva-Retrovir-Epivir.
Only 10 of the 257 patients (about 4%) taking Sustiva-Viread-Emtriva dropped out of the study due to adverse events, compared to 23 of the 254 (about 9%) of those taking Sustiva-Retrovir-Epivir.
Anecdotal data also suggested that fat loss from the extremities, a common side effect of antiretroviral therapy, occurred less often among patients in the single-pill regimen arm of the study. But the researchers say that because they did not collect body-fat measurements of the study subjects before beginning drug treatment they cannot quantify their observations.
Because the single-pill combination was shown to be more effective than Sustiva-Retrovir-Epivir combination, and in light of the ease of one-pill, once-daily dosing, the researchers say it is likely the Sustiva-Viread-Emtriva combo pill will be favored by many HIV doctors and patients when it becomes available. Officials at Gilead and BMS say they plan to submit a marketing application to the Food and Drug Administration this spring. If approved, the single-pill regimen could be available in the United States by the end of the year. (Advocate.com)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.