An Oregon judge
has thrown out a lawsuit brought by a gay couple who
charged that a photo taken at their wedding was used
illegally in an attack ad by a conservative group, the
New York Sun reported Monday.
Judge Reggis Walton said the antigay group,
United Seniors Association, did not violate the law
when it ran the photo without getting permission. The
photo appeared in an Internet ad in February 2005 condemning
the American Association of Retired Persons,
the newspaper reported. The ad was part of a
campaign United Seniors launched last winter to
criticize AARP for opposing President Bush's plan to change
Social Security.
"While the defendants' unauthorized use of the
plaintiffs' photograph cannot be considered the
pinnacle of decency and good taste, this court cannot
conclude that it violated Oregon civil law," the judge
wrote. The ruling reversed a temporary restraining
order he issued in March 2005 barring United Seniors
from using the image of the couple. (Advocate.com)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.