Four New Jersey lawmakers last week announced they were withdrawing their lawsuit to stop needle-exchange programs in three cities because the order authorizing the exchanges had expired on December 31.
Before leaving office in 2004, Gov. James E. McGreevey declared a public health emergency and authorized syringe exchanges in Atlantic City, Camden, and a third, unnamed city. Opponents challenged the order immediately, saying McGreevey had no right to bypass the legislature on the issue.
State senators Ronald Rice, a Democrat, and Tom Kean, a Republican, joined assemblymen Joe Pennacchio and Eric Munoz, both Republicans, in filing a lawsuit against the order. In June 2005, the appellate division agreed with the lawmakers and stayed McGreevey's order. The next month, a three-judge appellate division panel shot down Atlantic City's needle-exchange program, saying it violated state drug laws. Proponents of needle exchanges have since filed a petition with the New Jersey supreme court to hear the case.
New Jersey and Delaware are the only states that do not have needle-exchange programs. Supporters say the programs help curb the spread of HIV and other blood-borne diseases among injection-drug users. But opponents argue they send the wrong message about drug use and that they fail to address underlying social ills like poverty and unemployment that lead to drug abuse.
Legislation authorizing syringe-exchange programs has been introduced in both houses of the New Jersey legislature, which convened January 10. A similar bill was approved by the assembly in the prior session but stalled in the senate. Gov. Jon S. Corzine has indicated that he would support establishing needle-exchange programs. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.