A Japanese court
rejected a male-to-female transsexual's request to
change her officially registered sex because she already has
two children who were born before the operation, a
news report said Monday.
The Gifu Prefecture family court on January 16
turned down a sex-change registration request filed by
Atsuko Mizuno, 44, Kyodo News agency reported Mizuno
as saying. Gifu is located 171 miles west of Tokyo.
Mizuno said the court denied the request because
the 2004 law permitting changing one's registered sex
stipulates that the individual must be unmarried with
no children, Kyodo reported. Family court officials
declined to comment on the report, citing privacy concerns.
The 2004 law allows people to change their
registered sex if they've had a sex-change operation
and have been diagnosed by at least two doctors as
having gender-identity disorder. Applicants must be aged 20
or older, unmarried with no children, and not be able
to reproduce.
The rationale for including the stipulation
regarding children is that children would be confused
should a parent change his or her registered sex,
according to the home page of a transgender support group
that Mizuno coheads. Mizuno filed the request because
she wanted to demonstrate "that it is the legislation
and the family court ruling that are making things
confusing," she said, according to Kyodo.
Mizuno was married and had two children before
being diagnosed with a gender-identity disorder in
2001 and undergoing a sex-change operation, the agency
said. Mizuno and the children's mother are divorced, the
report added.
A Japanese court granted a transsexual's
sex-change registration request for the first time in
July 2004, shortly after the new law was implemented.
(AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.