
Stymied in his
efforts to win approval of a new state law to outlaw
discrimination based on sexual orientation, Oregon governor
Ted Kulongoski plans to create a task force to study
whether new laws are needed to guarantee equal rights
for gays and lesbians.
Kulongoski, who was to sign an executive order
Thursday establishing the task force, said the issue
involves basic fairness and making Oregon "a better
place for everyone to live."
At the start of the 2005 legislature, the
Democratic governor listed as a high priority winning
passage of a bill that would ban discrimination
against gays in employment, housing, and public
accommodations as well as allow civil unions for gay
couples. The measure was approved by the
Democrat-controlled senate, but it died in the house
after house speaker Karen Minnis and other Republicans said
the civil unions provision would violate the spirit of
a same-sex marriage ban approved by Oregon voters in
November 2004.
In announcing the creation of the new task
force, Kulongoski said the house GOP's refusal to
approve the gay rights bill didn't end the debate.
"That's why this task force is important: to continue the
dialogue about how to make Oregon a state of economic
and social opportunity for all of our citizens
regardless of race, gender, age, or sexual
orientation," Kulongoski said Wednesday in a prepared statement.
The governor said the task force would comprise
eight to 12 members appointed by him and would make
recommendations to the 2007 legislature on what
changes are needed to "assure equal protection" for gays
and lesbians.
In particular, he said, the task force will look
for ways "to ensure that Oregon law provides an
appropriate legal pathway for grievance, enforcement,
and resolution if Oregonians experience unequal treatment or
discrimination in either the public or private sectors."
Last November, Oregon's voter-approved ban on
same-sex marriage was upheld by a judge who turned
aside arguments from gay rights supporters that the
measure is flawed and should not have been put to a
statewide vote. Gay rights supporters later said they
would appeal the ruling while continuing the political
fight in the 2007 legislature to gain more rights and
benefits for gay couples. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.