
The leader of
Britain's Conservative Party says that his party's failure
to openly accept gay people in the past was morally
wrong—and, he says, it might have contributed
to his brother's death.
Tory leader Francis Maude told the gay news Web
site PinkNews.co.uk, "The gay scene in London in the
1980s was quite aggressively promiscuous, and I think
if society generally—and the government I served
in—had been more willing to recognize gay people,
then there would have been less of that problem."
Maude's gay brother Charles died of AIDS in 1993.
In the interview published Thursday, Maude also
said that he now regrets having voted for the Section
28 legislation banning local government from
"promoting" homosexuality, which led to the closing of
many gay support groups. Asked about the Tories'
reputation, Maude said, "We've been seen for a long
time as a party which hasn't been very open to gay
people. That's wrong." (Sirius OutQ News)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.