

After being
criticized by fellow Christian conservatives for his
unexpected support of proposed legislation that would give
same-sex couples some limited legal protections, Focus
on the Family founder James Dobson used his radio
broadcast Thursday to fight back.
Bloggers and Christian commentators have
criticized Dobson for endorsing a Colorado measure
that would allow any two people who can't marry to
sign up and obtain the right to visit one another in the
hospital, transfer property, and make medical
decisions for one another. The measure
is competing with a domestic-partnership proposal from
Democratic lawmakers in Denver, which the Colorado
Springs–based ministry and other conservatives
oppose because it would be available only for gay
couples, which they say is discriminatory.
The domestic-partnership measure also would
treat gay couples essentially the same as married
couples under the law, at least at the statewide
level. The proposal supported by Focus on the Family
provides only those rights that people can obtain
currently if they hire an attorney to draw up the paperwork.
Dobson, who is also supporting a measure to
constitutionally ban same-sex marriage in the state,
said he believes in providing equality under the law
but doesn't want to redefine marriage. He speculated that
commentators who aren't as well-known as he is are
trying to get more attention for themselves by
criticizing him.
He said one blogger posting on Alan Keyes's Web
site called the proposal "a drag queen in proper
conservative blue blazer, button-down shirt, and red
tie." The posting had been removed by Thursday, and Keyes
issued an apology to Dobson on the site.
"I'm used to getting beaten from the radicals,
from the Left. I deal with that because that goes with
the territory," Dobson said. "I really find it very
difficult to be attacked in such an unfair way from
conservatives who claim to follow the cause of Christ."
Another critic, Paul Cameron of the Colorado
Springs–based Family Research Institute, said
Thursday that Dobson has "come off the tracks" of the
Christian movement in backing rights for gay couples.
Cameron believes gay people are more prone to crime and
disease and don't have children, so they shouldn't be
entitled to the same rights as married people.
"The destructive should never get the honors that
belong to the productive," he said.
Cameron is also critical of Focus on the
Family's attempts to get gay people to change their
sexuality, saying the group is wrong to focus on gays
as "victims."
The bill's sponsor, Republican state
senator Shawn Mitchell, has long opposed
expanding gay rights but said he got the idea for his
proposal after reading an essay by Ramesh Ponnuru in the
National Review last June. Mitchell said he
wanted to address complaints that gays are discriminated
against but avoid the issue of whether their
relationships should be recognized as marriage or
something like it.
He said his bill isn't a political ploy to head
off the Democratic proposal and said he had tried to
win the support of software millionaire and gay rights
advocate Tim Gill. Gill's political adviser, Ted Trimpa,
confirmed he met with Mitchell to discuss it but said the
final language of the bill didn't go far enough.
"The fact that they're supporting the issue
means they recognize there's economic, health, and
financial unfairness," Trimpa said. "At least their
proposal starts to address that."
Mitchell thinks his approach could take the
same-sex marriage issue off the table so lawmakers can
address other matters that he said affect more people.
"I'm excited about what seems to be a fair and reasonable
solution to some of these issues. If some of the extremists
on both sides of the issue are shooting at it, maybe
I'm on to something," he said. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.