South Dakota's senate education committee on Tuesday rejected by 4–3 a measure that would have prohibited the distribution of condoms, birth control pills, and other contraceptives on public school property.
Republican state representative Keri Weems sponsored the bill, saying that it was in part a response to earlier testimony in a house committee that birth control had been distributed at school. Weems could not name a school where this had occurred but said that the measure was preventive in nature.
"This is a policy statement of what we don't want happening in our schools," Weems said. "We're here to set policy and not just rectify wrongdoing." Condoms can give teens a false sense of security, she said. "It is a preventive issue," agreed Republican state senator Eric Bogue.
"I think the bill is a solution looking for a problem," said Dick Tieszen, a Sioux Falls, S.D., school district lobbyist. He added that it is offensive to suggest contraception has been distributed at public schools.
His view was shared by a mother of four, Mary LaHood, who said, "I have yet to hear any evidence that this is a widespread problem or even a sporadic problem." Concerned parents, LaHood added, can always talk with teachers, counselors, or school officials.
"If it's truly a policy that's running amok, you have all the ability in the world to rectify it," said Sen. Ed Olsen, the committee chairman. "I have great faith in local schools to do what's right."
Though the measure had passed the house, its failure in senate committee effectively killed the bill. If passed, it would have carried a misdemeanor penalty for violations, punishable by up to 30 days in jail and $500 in fines, said Bogue. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.